From nobody Mon Feb 24 04:42:13 2025 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z1T5n5H73z5pkTQ for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 04:58:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z1T5m6zckz3HpT for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 04:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=freebsd.org (policy=none); spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 198.144.192.42 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of yuri@FreeBSD.org) smtp.mailfrom=yuri@FreeBSD.org Received: from [192.168.5.3] (c-98-42-44-116.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.42.44.116]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 51O4gEgc048329 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2025 20:42:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-98-42-44-116.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.42.44.116] claimed to be [192.168.5.3] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------aeShD65MqBL7lO0TBrSwbLWl" Message-ID: Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 20:42:13 -0800 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: "ports@freebsd.org" From: Yuri Subject: Are pourdiere VMs memory-limited? X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.80 / 15.00]; VIOLATED_DIRECT_SPF(3.50)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.996]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.20)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[freebsd.org : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; RBL_SENDERSCORE_REPUT_8(0.00)[198.144.192.42:from]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[yuri]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7961, ipnet:198.144.192.0/23, country:US]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z1T5m6zckz3HpT X-Spamd-Bar: + This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------aeShD65MqBL7lO0TBrSwbLWl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There is the MAX_MEMORY setting in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf that is commented out by default. Is it set in the poudriere on the builder servers? What happens when it is set to some limit and this limit is exceeded? Are these processes swapped or killed in such case? I am looking into possible reasons why one port fails with runaway error on arm64. One possible reason is that MAX_MEMORY is set and this process is getting swapped in and out which makes it to run "forever". Thanks, Yuri --------------aeShD65MqBL7lO0TBrSwbLWl Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit There is the MAX_MEMORY setting in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf that is commented out by default.
Is it set in the poudriere on the builder servers?
What happens when it is set to some limit and this limit is exceeded? Are these processes swapped or killed in such case?
I am looking into possible reasons why one port fails with runaway error on arm64.
One possible reason is that MAX_MEMORY is set and this process is getting swapped in and out which makes it to run "forever".


Thanks,
Yuri


--------------aeShD65MqBL7lO0TBrSwbLWl-- From nobody Mon Feb 24 05:46:56 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z1V9y0WhSz5ppC0 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 05:47:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic305-19.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic305-19.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z1V9x5m6Qz3qfq for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 05:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=cW9rYrG4; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.64.82 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1740376031; bh=K4IWUrRE7iam9mNt1UyzzElAxgv7sCMW0ozt48uEEg0=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=cW9rYrG4g4LjZq4DwfQQOjZd4xFkgtilr4rjnQR5IqF0aDB3HiV/foO39+gsxqhDg5RhQzm/OyYnhYRQ7/AYkll0/4/qAxdhWxmB5ocgOxeUGshv6pinsjHm07HiPYZVhae99m6xavLPMTQwDrwx6YtKx063sycAmCjBGxRWvK0bj5XLHMoIZlVNHoZLj8Qn0B7C3b+lYtT0d/584xAMx7hPGEyuTqrzZ+UAVYJacjke/g6lTmTN1x0O5ZorWKXebLJWo1VjMkO2/zxddUXrbC8FRtdSDETJwwOYNilhjKNdl0QfAJdrz+cXxiFPrYcAoL8JyuHieuvYEZp+IEuC7w== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1740376031; bh=HO+PZVVZq3XqRnIgcHrYxrhXs+ru6oyi0OX9J/2gySb=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:Subject:Date:To:From:Subject; b=Y18ku245Gl7A6cg6k/rdI1f4V45a8cEaJNUZnW5hRiyM9vXfcXAa4WnAJ20awzabYcrqLRwHGUbeHxauNq1NWU9E+wqH14giv10bMz0kmM84V1F6zg+J8G4HP+FW6y0hxxNtFNlB99Ewwv5DxWt3TEy+1vO25KCX3tKeyLnWrt15uQYOiP3NVYmAjvv+DDXeh3Ru+XLeeNG6C16y1vjAERs6jD34Zwyg0L2AUDSVRuzIG+o2VNfbUROIeOG2YEtqZ7/O8Z79WJ1DORT9aKfE42uSeuBUv6+pJ5/u/GlPXtHDUet2sPjVlX/qRiW+8VmRX0qNsCDxhEzD5b15jZsbBw== X-YMail-OSG: RykIdxMVM1mqexCQzQIMTZI8dc941e6CqrQsNBK_W4r3LxD4CGBPgUEvyt6RvVn Xafi7RudTv3.SGJMwlAWZBqU3QxcjwkCsXPNuorz.NRG4SSTC271DmPsmZ9T_x_uXCELEuIX63a1 EpJEDH7fA81E8MWuqF2R5EKLZNVqMJ38wLTH7TNpFOqWyj1l3NBypodAa5ha32JZcFHr9i51vrxD mzAaeYlrhLFD1PkhQa4IhIUtBdrL59UtcuzOYgw2DBa5myPoZxHlba_C1MXQZoXhDhnXmQDVZK8V 6GLdzFtuSpHK3XS2QHdTZfCDcKoO_F9sEryNMPmmtscXw61qZT6D6obVnN68DCG10FZ3_qpsNmen vyttA1LpHBj3XRP3WiiqoYeGAWpqx2ExYekkUdxdCNndj1vsGxsnHel_y7PQOUqT5jxl7dNXtKRR KHWbdQeVg7OyDI96PcrXyZ.L3IWipwgFRhagms6fGtE2iOP969oDRVtqVWhowDnjeGjmQ8QDDsSw c5UJmKuMdQWDyg_n.DL_rxmJlBTrHd1x7qFTvcxT8j1ZtJ9hXIIGYCY5i1Dh9aB50XTFRa5t_1dy XXiznU2HPPpYaz3nn7ySoUUyehjh4JXeRvlwmFZV2mmqUssh21c3ssCM9zynd6PlU4US2KVBjhd_ PZZtJnIzXGvYFx5wy9Av3zFvhdN56_2QklIuWpyrKOI693c_Xaea.iVbzFcP.q5W9YUyTCyVFdAm GAcDr0GYGCsDSSVGDecWvwByzLgEYhus2Uc59hPtQa0fmB1cQ4zRhuWvFXkPJySWu2sWmjofPSQm Fa1a4fU.YdNekyRHahQUXPG3LOFk6VmrV8DQ0lkap0ZbwnKm.4R6.H0hTFaY923w6DZSmfC3b8Mp k8PqqP9hEHfVe2IHehB8FOc_V7N4bwjDXDS6POq1E_0CUqW20UMsHudQ4YuTOt2.H.ciE7o.yb8k sESL4D076eCNiwzFTC80DYNXmKo.iCmQUdpDlTfQIFNPhX9ep4MNiGK98AJlkuF0zbX13G9KW0yj XvDsPM4eVzfc8EbupGttBILkSIxcVq78UWlWEITIoxhEgh8Fhb4DGeKHmCfQXgIIG3L_C3QrLkD1 JrOu635qLOZXJwxNI.v4b5Uos7lXNc4GlQi6G3.QJnls9eyy3t80yGub4p.eNtdnscnPYrdtbhz8 x_1QGm6dD68FcEsfPZDwS24DH4XM8MWqexKCkAoVkW.yZOSkyJbDov8IvvChSeREvv2ICen40dhS wkhNHzjlxa0KpfH2N_44ckWHTDGMzrNXWQv4JNqz.OdzjVglN7MXyUmHBn3yBKwSpM_T8xbk9Y4M fWD.PrPXeNKYpv_gZEts.76xrO66Vfju3dkOhnfkAnr8xCuvn3a90WhgI.X9Ok_0W9BPYbuW3rS3 dGl3JW74pEh4eYDKnD0hB14lEfl8Gd9NuHf7qpoxYdvgCQ4cvKdMiFEJJhHdOOx2vzY2M105bhDu k_G6kz4qTQYFpR3BNc8it2pe6WS_MlKWmqDhkXOzFcV3iXWTOvw2x_yozQBkNbw6mNopitasvU2V .QdNBoVQlEjx.StXhB5o8lf5nLou0vU203Q2_DPy.LNWaZ2vC.dQ9.myPKvm.VXhbnIFf.cuvjnG mnedrr64Yf9PPSQpIJD7RQVdaDahxCky2cfmfJuYoCiU43teIoKZEKvx0KxcEzR3kbbBKVmCnYKc _.sG5j8.BXj.396Ws0y1nPU0fPk9UNiX9El9eTEvYKouh9jJhRWsbx7KSt.XrUlCY4nsU.Wn63TG 3gHvh24ZTF8ORSx4w_BInPFRlcO9GtRspgwsW4Sn5BK4eOfKXS1j0B1FmSyns40jtqFIb0nRYaw8 fTT280C30lfuml7JksGVgNG8Zpln0TE6CLsmIEHeS9VOJulzZCnk3Ek7F0Pogsn5LhTCh.QCUefo 1ux8px8Vle3gvKfftL.Ua23koMoCfdwFch9k3cSJkibO08NgOsgtYV43uNHUidDEJmgEs5U26Rdf 2L8izGkteCIBzZFhVzefhCpu4ZWv5LVUNt4qG2mXCd0tVam9ajRYNxP6MIk_oA_Yk33yFmTqu4si PUSA383AOViv0dO8_VxqKr3lvmvb_uFCRz6uJSvFgnvbImREBNdZLJfCkBAXBXP.g7F9f0RpZLGj rZhXmZah90fHqyFC2Cyy9qeljQ.LyvCV9mGwTNKCsCi5SZH1OhKcqRq1W_WixlqF5FKSHqt9mHRy Otb1LhUZIEr4lhGhk6AZbxRy.asfZlZUn81yOSK2KW7k51GePfCHW3LJS3zWhw5UfeOeKhAZ8ufy b X-Sonic-MF: X-Sonic-ID: 7f8c427e-0c78-4a8e-a879-a7806b02371c Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic305.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 05:47:11 +0000 Received: by hermes--production-gq1-5dd4b47f46-n48bg (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 37a7b1cfcb581f2400b77f05fba3ee90; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 05:47:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.400.131.1.6\)) Subject: RE: Are pourdiere VMs memory-limited? Message-Id: <3C48C902-B55A-49F7-8D9A-BE52BEE27CEB@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 21:46:56 -0800 To: Yuri , FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.400.131.1.6) References: <3C48C902-B55A-49F7-8D9A-BE52BEE27CEB.ref@yahoo.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 15.00]; RBL_SENDERSCORE_REPUT_9(-1.00)[98.137.64.82:from]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.64.82:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.64.82:from] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z1V9x5m6Qz3qfq X-Spamd-Bar: --- Yuri wrote on Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 04:42:13 UTC : > There is the MAX_MEMORY setting in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf that is > commented out by default. > Is it set in the poudriere on the builder servers? > What happens when it is set to some limit and this limit is exceeded? > Are these processes swapped or killed in such case? main [so: 15 as stands] does not swap out kernel stacks any more. There is only paging to/from swap space. I'm not aware of any parameter for causing a process specific size that leads to that specific process starting to page. Paging is based on more of a system level criteria. > I am looking into possible reasons why one port fails with runaway error > on arm64. What port/package? I happend to have done a "bulk -ca" test recently and could look at the log for that package's build. The style of handling was to set up to allow high load averages relative to the number of cores: one builder per core but each active builder allowed that same number of processes: core-count squared process possible, even when everything is respecting the limits. (Some packages do not for a time and end up with more processes/threads.) Overall the 'bulk -ca' activity was spread over something like 56 to 60 hours. This was in a VM. (14 Parallels VM cores on a MacBook Pro M4 MAX with 16 cores. 104 GiBytes of Parallels RAM of 128 GiBytes in the system. RAM+SWAP being 351 GiBytes or so total. But the test showed that high volume paging in the VM did not mix well with the kernel's "taking too long" sorts of criteria for starting kills. Luckily my normal build activities can avoid such significant paging.) > One possible reason is that MAX_MEMORY is set and this process is > getting swapped in and out which makes it to run "forever". === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com From nobody Mon Feb 24 06:14:14 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z1Vn50lS0z5prS8 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 06:14:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z1Vn443ZPz46D0 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 06:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from [192.168.5.3] (c-98-42-44-116.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.42.44.116]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id 51O6EFE3066381 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 23 Feb 2025 22:14:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-98-42-44-116.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.42.44.116] claimed to be [192.168.5.3] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------lUYsA6CmHF2UNx7hTI3Uu3ia" Message-ID: <5c4376d4-9f09-40be-8c63-93619b104b81@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 22:14:14 -0800 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Are pourdiere VMs memory-limited? To: Mark Millard , FreeBSD Mailing List References: <3C48C902-B55A-49F7-8D9A-BE52BEE27CEB.ref@yahoo.com> <3C48C902-B55A-49F7-8D9A-BE52BEE27CEB@yahoo.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Yuri In-Reply-To: <3C48C902-B55A-49F7-8D9A-BE52BEE27CEB@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7961, ipnet:198.144.192.0/23, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z1Vn443ZPz46D0 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------lUYsA6CmHF2UNx7hTI3Uu3ia Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/23/25 21:46, Mark Millard wrote: > What port/package? finance/hyperswitch in arm64. It builds in a very high memory (20GB) on amd64, which is probably what causes runaway builds on arm64. Yuri --------------lUYsA6CmHF2UNx7hTI3Uu3ia Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 2/23/25 21:46, Mark Millard wrote:
What port/package?

finance/hyperswitch in arm64.

It builds in a very high memory (20GB) on amd64, which is probably what causes runaway builds on arm64.


Yuri

--------------lUYsA6CmHF2UNx7hTI3Uu3ia-- From nobody Mon Feb 24 06:52:04 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z1Wcw4mxTz5pvQ2 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 06:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Received: from aragorn.amdh.fr (aragorn.groumpf.org [176.31.180.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z1Wcv3vzBz3LLQ for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 06:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=groumpf.org header.s=dkim header.b=BMpLJduy; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of xavier@groumpf.org designates 176.31.180.205 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=xavier@groumpf.org Received: from numenor.groumpf.org (freebox-server.groumpf.org [82.64.247.11]) by aragorn.amdh.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436053E608DE for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 07:52:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from numenor.groumpf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by numenor.groumpf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019C9190A87 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 07:52:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=groumpf.org; h= in-reply-to:from:from:content-language:references:subject :subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id :content-type:content-type:received:received; s=dkim; t= 1740379925; x=1741243926; bh=b1x7eR2LPSEhEuHDrrMKa96tZRu9BBzNYRG 8noeOcMM=; b=BMpLJduyGRUtac8FSryjmN0mG8OVR20xw5bUfVBr2THQaW3C4Qq PYpTaqCMAcP9DbIykgT6m0W+K2lpqPFjpqjfryV/QQkwkcM4UW6jPBfpXf7UHMGe 4EZC4JID6veWtLchT/rEQ82UpDTMh4kOcXGrs2EM2iQy5H3CIFEiDvYMNKn7jYXD wcbN41Y9VrX7b1XNVYXjGaqadsWTRsYkrcRF7wEdLWO3GNp26XYRbvzAPC5LORlz g41J20QuhN7/InUmO1wxN1atZRO7V12wfOQHt4zhloN+d+eqmzpOBrHYS4ukxbTc 7/LJB0HfRfAAWsm2eATlBWlpg9WeLJoa3TKa/NKMJXJIpVL6Cl+X5/9+lgDHL+8I JFMER7jEkpsXClb/7gJmh6zHVOccZlFGm5+pk5PB5wFpc2IuNeZIEpZeAcOeK7Ag na+CNzTeqQTaV9A8b54JxPDzrv+ZJ3zY4Vk5+3b5tKT3Szaxy14Z5cbL+7WJiGMG GVTJzwHrDHCQZIDcEjQAmgzjuOgykBYzFfIF6Mn1TobiQT8VWc4quBUFadsf9kkP R6TOvXJAtitBThh4CwejjYlaSDITPOTeYdsWpcOXiGtsBIoWKYaNRGKttkSGQZ9e qI0b3UGlVoh2ftYZEFujBIHG8GhlHIFrRMn0ZL4JD9tbFKexLclrdxNY= Received: from numenor.groumpf.org ([127.0.0.1]) by numenor.groumpf.org (ns3.groumpf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3FZ8i61vHcLp for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 07:52:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.100.30] (imladris.groumpf.org [192.168.100.30]) by numenor.groumpf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE033190B01 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 07:52:04 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------EVjSBxC18AKMJ4BVRMcIwskh" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 07:52:04 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: OpenJDK and ccache (again) To: FreeBSD Ports ML References: <3f2dd025-53e6-48f0-a4fb-98693af56e41@groumpf.org> <35cf993bac1b98345910b590560eefac@mail.infomaniak.com> Content-Language: fr From: Xavier Humbert In-Reply-To: <35cf993bac1b98345910b590560eefac@mail.infomaniak.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.40 / 15.00]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[9]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:176.31.180.205]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[groumpf.org:s=dkim]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:176.31.0.0/16, country:FR]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[groumpf.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[groumpf.org:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z1Wcv3vzBz3LLQ X-Spamd-Bar: -- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------EVjSBxC18AKMJ4BVRMcIwskh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 22/02/2025 19:56, Daniel Engberg a écrit : > On 2025-02-22T14:41:48.000+01:00, Xavier Humbert > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Tried everything to build OpenJDK with ccache : > > > > > > Here is part of my /etc/make.conf > > > > > > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/ports/java/openjdk17} > > >   NO_CCACHE=yes > > > .endif > > > > > > Despite of this : > > > > > > [root@numenor openjdk17]# CCACHE_DISABLE=yes NO_CCACHE=yes  make all > > > [...] > > > configure: Will use user supplied compiler CC=cc > > > checking for cc... /usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc > > > checking resolved symbolic links for CC... /usr/local/bin/ccache > > > configure: Please use --enable-ccache instead of providing a wrapped > > > compiler. > > > configure: error: /usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc is a symbolic link to > > > ccache. This is not supported. > > > configure exiting with result code 1 > > > ===>  Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > > Please report the problem to java@FreeBSD.org > [maintainer] and attach the > > > "/usr/ports/java/openjdk17/work/jdk17u-jdk-17.0.14-7-1/config.log" > including > > > the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be > a good > > > idea > > > to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system > (e.g. a > > > /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea). > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Google does not help, just mentioning this problem has been already > > > reported, and is supposed to be fixed > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Xavier > > > > > > -- > > > Xavier HUMBERT - Unix/Win/MacOSX Sysadmin/Network Engineer > > > https://www.amdh.fr > > > > Hi, > > Do you expect any significat gain? > On my Ryzen 7900 using -j8 it takes less than 3 minutes to build using > Poudriere and tmpfs. > > Best regards, > Daniel I expect not that much gain, but is here, and I want to disable it for that port Regards, Xavier -- Xavier HUMBERT - Unix/Win/MacOSX Sysadmin/Network Engineer https://www.amdh.fr --------------EVjSBxC18AKMJ4BVRMcIwskh Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Le 22/02/2025 19:56, Daniel Engberg a écrit :
On 2025-02-22T14:41:48.000+01:00, Xavier Humbert <xavier@groumpf.org> wrote:


            
Hi,

            

            


            

            
Tried everything to build OpenJDK with ccache :

            

            


            

            
Here is part of my /etc/make.conf

            

            


            

            
.if ${.CURDIR:M*/ports/java/openjdk17}

            

            
   NO_CCACHE=yes

            

            
.endif

            

            


            

            
Despite of this :

            

            


            

            
[root@numenor openjdk17]# CCACHE_DISABLE=yes
              NO_CCACHE=yes  make all

            

            
[...]

            

            
configure: Will use user supplied compiler CC=cc

            

            
checking for cc... /usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc

            

            
checking resolved symbolic links for CC...
              /usr/local/bin/ccache

            

            
configure: Please use --enable-ccache instead of
              providing a wrapped 

            

            
compiler.

            

            
configure: error: /usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc is a
              symbolic link to 

            

            
ccache. This is not supported.

            

            
configure exiting with result code 1

            

            
===>  Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.

            

            
Please report the problem to java@FreeBSD.org [maintainer]
              and attach the

            

            
"/usr/ports/java/openjdk17/work/jdk17u-jdk-17.0.14-7-1/config.log"
              including

            

            
the output of the failure of your make command. Also,
              it might be a good 

            

            
idea

            

            
to provide an overview of all packages installed on
              your system (e.g. a

            

            
/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea).

            

            
*** Error code 1

            

            


            

            
Google does not help, just mentioning this problem has
              been already 

            

            
reported, and is supposed to be fixed

            

            


            

            
Regards,

            

            


            

            
Xavier

            

            


            

            
-- 

            

            
Xavier HUMBERT - Unix/Win/MacOSX Sysadmin/Network
              Engineer
Hi,

Do you expect any significat gain?
On my Ryzen 7900 using -j8 it takes less than 3 minutes to build using Poudriere and tmpfs.

Best regards,
Daniel

I expect not that much gain, but is here, and I want to disable it for that port

Regards,

Xavier

-- 
Xavier HUMBERT - Unix/Win/MacOSX Sysadmin/Network Engineer
https://www.amdh.fr
--------------EVjSBxC18AKMJ4BVRMcIwskh-- From nobody Mon Feb 24 08:36:44 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z1Yxt5kKRz5q4JH for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 08:37:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic315-8.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic315-8.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z1Yxt4SSvz3Kkw for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 08:37:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1740386220; bh=7ppvKathn0JCfKcR8eJSV3HnZlEpEJxAhOpuZSkrpMk=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=jJUkgPPzPEHLjdZXrxmcWCtpxfUwh2rdEiFyYo9AUCidPize7TQ5btr5MR8PUjYdR1xmWe/6d7MpTqy9EKQXq85DtTluTURXNR1s51BOIIGZ+qMjEJBPPwKcElGPeJZm7Nbp8h8+AIKSMRFAasCE4Y3oh2ZyxTsXxR9L+cQ6ti8NbcBTnomFBoC3AfTOIwAqB2tfWr0fZcgR40evARsx4wtUB6rc06ImpwnWmGv1CH1GdOAwZ4jobXkr51qTXHzirzT6vdD+iUIjlLxWguJ4pZRk11ejcULoDKA3YcD7dYrdu2luxEFvoka9Z1rGguuhcABi9jHvMOz7kkkMPsbl/Q== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1740386220; bh=pEzoaUJsLSedg+MLQgrmX2KsJwHcZQHyDVlz6JLY0eo=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=HHkrMK7LAX0gzS5i0gU1c6CMkwlh1tKk6m3qnmva9Ph4XubWKOockGtzjNI8DWpgKCrTEMRqrln2H592C34oeenETkpd6LRCn4LdmMdwtKx+4A8Zwe2xAhK2PsWK07rkd9XF5gJRg0nrRXmLm/luhXMRqcHT9Rg5wh9/8JH8cotKrMSuV4439l9uZ209EQkeFnoGtFcAc+uq89RRK7+n/GqHlvkAZNxf918FztYog8ADA+vuHNgPsVWAhrJkJtpxbIG4gjBGGw2CxDj/FdPYr05GcZJjuZjGLrZ4h5SP7h3Gsl+9aso7Fp8rDfQEYw80aileqMA/+ORIgYWV5P6T/A== X-YMail-OSG: S5NsoIQVM1m40p4RvrXRG0sfUICU5KUVxxavJ5CieJ5KOK1LC60Ut2Hx6wF54zQ DlfDTAzS6xPHiWlqI.fnbjVYcAEhQtyYuDvl4_aLlxW1Qzl5.AU3hIO0A5RNVc0TumqPt3zKAktG eogQoSwkjzs1O1.DGIB1_.IZgh90k7j1oxGKSVSf1fxXMsTke5oUM5mumoWvO1jd6OD0fmvZUi0d ccCS9fQ1_aQ5f3TnyRHIWw5ITuIh_OIN2wmZkFK2NDunLEfq0wDZwHS7h_Vv2S9v.Ag0T.eX0IRR VYDuksWd2xiAokUQ6rg0szHrrYg5lvTg.TGr8m3gvwKxC2wroUOzd4i7BY6NF4hn0v9XClGZSmMI 4qHYgLCY.WifaoFqaboUbmmMjJCV7vGYxQ.sJ.nGCtYK5t8CjsdFzNOBMUYdi_zWN2Da5_8TfkWQ ddBH2vtDkMujP3zYJ5M_kZcQ1gKVRxC_nS32YYPCoQN8R9m1qKquqXMEC6Eg_0G9Juj8swWESDYy K6.6b3UklsPAbmBvp6s70agbJZIdA6QS_rpLnhVXZ0M9v1O8x71efqPbzzAn8cNPtyAVMIoHd8h8 k5uXq4mlUDPPB0LbMpTIZmWCC87J_jC63LGJs17Nyt3fjl9YnsAWneeYnpB6kQEViqdi_qk7DBBj SGfa9nyx2nBf5t3xL.lAlGtbnhfv.sHdXxeXoeWm7pUNtarhUUly_50uPujmx96c_y_iP9vsewIF .Op3ZRXZZbJJVjzGuRkZpFLhc1fo.TkRLxM47Bk0GdTcKrHMY7LhxzIErrJO_EUOjIVr0huN0lKB GFM7WBru4VCHQzBkF1YLBRD8b8434o0nWZGbm06n18dgb4GV5e_3pCsAVvoJ6z_MqB0pZDAYrU.1 R_8sFhGyL_iaRAT3fx4s5KmGIP9ncz2y6ig0Z.LaR3xA6xuBK.dgFRdNUskLl3NFeUqOnhoyl.tZ uQIZH0K1dSPfAkbbG0XBC2IJV0rpAfKBAOA.2bYFiuWGRm4t0t_CBsBoUSS7DeiY5pNF8L9Z2tBQ FLQj3VAUrrPuXuKBuE.kGu7Sm3U1iQmprq7dcKdRCYMws7LzPMN_Y3CX9d8WTm9rQr_xkOWFGPEn v88OAXhGFkz0ODNetizIOlCYox21VMpyq0nQEZYvZc9irJLJMsrjx0WBjLUe6vDXL3i_Xq7ufoaO Uw_IUyb8MXpTrLLMGGn1j2Z0LDEBnUbibS_0oYVjnkaxSphsIAzMyuJqESJmObVyxeXZWY_HC2v3 sPMyRCgdogxSjfUPKzdyi.JLP4_0LixUJIDbFviKQ0uvJA9biAA1v50Z_XyWE5fdE5aQe0O76e64 Ps_KNq8qOkkn5dEwfEHlSgcgeLkQyH.dITpY060UJyqfbpDaT51HypjWkQwrtKcpiJd7Q8UbXICC CRQWVM5cyHn0_bTWtI1LRCdLGFM.TAkZ8KLIZ9DUuVwGz1S3PNRaWbbGCS0pFxIVzZim6sKhRiv3 xoe6lH72xfDYqcQqjaKCmr6ZARhlqfkmVgebtiS3bKd6aN.rDnH6Ep189ELiv5JoWqRQYgcBpJWj ij9x1MiWrrKmsioTbPQfaKxGunvQ5yeKTHXn.XbtVeJawQbVnyUefhl4JlYg_EAscya6Ti3.26jA nDWKEYDjAdvQfwrkYYP0fXfkVjnj7pLHXh4w2ms7oj5RaH9tUxpIvk4ZkKGPFadY96VOMmCFJgOT Qs_6p1_px1yuF.Ok_P9zRfPPRfgbZIe.VyzNLAfgvmopz8ps79RCws4y6TlW8_Ts4B6Pw3NHBpAl amfc4DMLNnenPZnbGBjZbdatqPLnSK.AZ__hnPuwHI7CaVA5ldFHBymYZ8qRvOgjJ5S..Dm5Og5N eItW758NwBzjqDC.PwtqKbff5AysHhjfX_fcx4BN44QBLIzNWZPeVV5HUr1vF4cJa0Lr4Mghyfwr qGmikXL6jZhpyDAisVY11K55VzhIvbhbxKB_EE7sLGPvMtpXFvq6_k5gzZTQUfnWFw7.qz36Kxgl 3q37_vFa6eXAgabZIgGlqm94a9gZPTVekhMA2eGUuV7r4K37LZidPN36lpSlEFFma2uFPIhEwyZT pAgiPVlRFiEvd5vMs5PzJMA7bSVn5fcx81rUn8Y63vHUcg7GorlvMD4rkoJ.YIZ9zGikqZGQvBY6 FUF06A1YGJYO486OdR3rX_g6DiMGWAlYI_QQwEAt.1WFJRG2Af8U4Kf5eZ_lF_b0QL4BZ7IEsZW9 cFNTe.On9vexZZ.19xtpQ0SWULi2OAqwPt1EPtGlEtenHwbLAaNnQQIukLtOUxyZzg2IC452Uwx1 aPw-- X-Sonic-MF: X-Sonic-ID: 8d9abd7e-0b25-41a8-994f-217c69481666 Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic315.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 08:37:00 +0000 Received: by hermes--production-gq1-5dd4b47f46-bxhh2 (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 5b224d64aadc8ee79e6dfc1f6bc934c2; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 08:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.400.131.1.6\)) Subject: Re: Are pourdiere VMs memory-limited? From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <5c4376d4-9f09-40be-8c63-93619b104b81@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:36:44 -0800 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <95F83853-303A-4435-A647-BBF81A874E94@yahoo.com> References: <3C48C902-B55A-49F7-8D9A-BE52BEE27CEB.ref@yahoo.com> <3C48C902-B55A-49F7-8D9A-BE52BEE27CEB@yahoo.com> <5c4376d4-9f09-40be-8c63-93619b104b81@FreeBSD.org> To: Yuri X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.400.131.1.6) X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z1Yxt4SSvz3Kkw X-Spamd-Bar: ---- On Feb 23, 2025, at 22:14, Yuri wrote: > On 2/23/25 21:46, Mark Millard wrote: >> What port/package? >=20 > finance/hyperswitch in arm64. >=20 > It builds in a very high memory (20GB) on amd64, which is probably = what causes runaway builds on arm64. For the bulk -ca with 14 builders for 14 VM cores on the M4 Max, each builder allowed: 14 processes : build of finance/hyperswitch | hyperswitch-2024.12.23.0_1 ended at = 2025-02-17T11:36:22-08:00 build time: 01:14:38 It likely had 13 other builders competing for cores over much of that = time. By itself it would have taken less time. (High load averages.) I could potentially force a rebuild by itself and monitor its RAM+SWAP = use, which would be for the core count involved in my context. Also, the time scale factor would give a clue about the load average ratio. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com From nobody Mon Feb 24 09:50:22 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z1bZm4wnfz5njSF for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:50:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic306-19.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic306-19.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.68.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z1bZl69kjz3sM5 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=YHZLPMKr; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.68.82 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1740390637; bh=pwHKMHg2HZwbldrrWH3y6rKX9S5PcgqzrQim3jcxjYU=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=YHZLPMKrgrrKBV3eebcitpEy3d3krvc7/VtrVJwzWoQAsSwCNCPC3D7T8QA7BumKz27zuropnjv2kBPN1R6P0GGaGoH5IkQ8EJIDPezw2T4UnCPcDvGbiioH7utKmIhcRi7ue2M/2aiamoEWhe2qyS82hjbDdBKaf9i1G1LPvsWMZzWcFySj0WchEVBWUh9HhhXsublWV5mpmV5G8YkkUjtG3sMH22XMcuzECld7qoN0m3xEf3EFNHghPlBd0rBkIMCtEvDMNdSpc9oy0ue5bhOm22xOdI/9FJRo8lwfOeWrex/at1FOigcX6tgUSjzTf3knJ3UMA30yaqwPo0odLw== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1740390637; bh=+eAqMEKscFeesRfrXV1pEhswYbZAqXkfhouzDnTCcHv=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=Zi+OGwPJiNqQLeaHo8VVssnoSh225YDSOPSyhNTV8ha3CtOJTJ9y2EPBB/jSvVdLgXct0HcMhX77+SB3qchSIyewvh0R8Xjb1mPqhA8CwXt6RFRiYM9wsq1ligSrRfCxryp8CvJ/04ZUrfM/I/fF084rTJcqm4gDbYoIy9KkI2mD+kDFKFT8If5dBueHGmn8+CAlD7ZJSIqgcN7QXJvBzqIosKi4UWZ20MHSTG4tfapWgxOrCqJOU156IuzAwhRBeg5mZ80GAOYYO7i0l5wUPjZ9jAGeAtduIUgK1Cf1iPTn+dqDUtdfD2jQ1Ogl6BOuKyEVzj8TcpEVRPSoPbBVgQ== X-YMail-OSG: ee5OEqMVM1nPKzJLTBMvU6YIHjSdtLma.LFZ.sycjRyRGm7q1EcgqCkCVAJv_Zs zAqQRBGlD03tZ9HIAcRkO53Mf_9oBvO94GLXp5nN_jHXOJiVhtQELynPzZlpBmnPE9NqZcpS0c3s SYb0v8CTYh0aQw1bR7ejMcw3lX3tA9NmaMlunwEVt_jsb7WDMVkI6qwFL2Niy2h5tXjkX8jvljS2 L1BsgpmFTKit1SHzEhnR_OfYxc0Dhez12C2cOwds7JmPyC703Tnms.pbrv9Bo7gKRKtjS35RNiFX pMtceAyl_ScRpc6Etqx3YB7TIQB9cfhbdiAb8ZpPtx8_Zh31RkZ0iJK4A1bMefZLlew6m7gV5Iw6 WFnjpk_dJ9yBv8hOTQnacjlqNEpodlT0AqlNBpydvEVOQIJ.wwkj3CxLQV8LHrMbdNSkUtBm15tQ Ly7PjpMv.x4FwAhHp5BG7OijitSUindzWbEl78GhJegFEqveuwPKQ2M6oeyxmpetEAeTng_L5KyB fA1wMx9HQcjkKTBMJIQz7RTp86Svl5m7sY1lndEoQ.LFcYIlql7YdrNla8osXSRjjsDi3gZhMBrj j1ywhaAXmsxsgbR0.cgIPDWYZvOnXR35G8g6vN8Ttk_e6W2YraJdZB_AnAygAe.sVCdX0QIcHMD. 078qLxF3AZAOJcoKSy4qmCgh4XvO2rtyWU0YMinsraYSPiiNgu8mzUoQ_H82uQA1MpUTwUTOZ00v fJ8S3uI6TGTzZZk8j8hKxnPZtE_wivbw_C1H8m66D3SU130tGFzYUapPecoA1h1.5xo_6N6m8Pgr lDfn0VG_whIszUMlflXr3y7qwMJAzDbHlJX04jU5Q_Ydv4omfYw018ekVrX0qqCPeILIWhFuRhRI nZXaVwXC9CArngEeHbvjAaTL4TBF4FzHivwcs.Mu1sACnFULjd0KQORCisQMroz2342tdhZ7DVlp eByCotLC_njgEps6tXkhDbMffQZ5wKq4137YVeeDOEnIoRJglM8nCgOkrlXajSJ3JzYPmGUVUtxb JV7SUZ1BHSezcm0ennCeLJU.Hce45xJp7q0Y4n1KyET8pnmlX4YCgw41d.O.5xvyo4y29evGTMei j2.yt4PgOlRFC7vKnId7oLWchGLLR6CavH3lGCWUS2Betl0axHRP2RLzbTwVhXgkcWN1AlPYGMp9 eq0wOiTgCOpInNHjMFUqjGRWlGVSDHXt3Fffl9ICklIy.D0xweI.WEKNBMIU05pFAKywGVjJupf4 02QLmmlKp3HcR5Yocf8.k6N6g1E2SYYzH9xRsayOTYaP3toPNMiofMy0ytsbaX24U5Ok2b9.Mn7t 396mEoJ6d2iwyKiLSWER66qYBmwFhkzle9z1vA.lbBsEEgpqJ24GkddjAVrFaZbKiTu.GWXPwAYe 8MVKrzb22XwS5k3TRH0qYgjs4CYqhAz3GV4RKyP866EPyzDFZKw6FACI85kIYYlqNg06LNbNX0Ai q17AIcFUyXBsy4qnzxJJmeBoovCjI0YMUq26cW2zGKetqzYUjNDLv_G79HeSpSrd6.bjF.GjRyJ9 A5wo7V87c6.RTnCkRNsNluRM5E2Zlzve2eAK6O29uoHJ7qJqkPvcG9oP_xXKH4nrQVEcYkr_uwri rdQJB7z_GV9nUXwfRDFwmMAoXgRXrdNOFsfYe8XE5AhfxedUByf64GI75.Uv5CaMPlohKzqkTjxG rI6wGY7p0Dkj4xetVBConQkjZp2.bNP_rto33URDbff5hhI3Fhz7WCUcMz0Ai7UtAI4LEQXHXFSl 17GWGXBw5yjnT5I2lH0zoh081AkRCo.G3YGOumCZX7NRxwZ4gHtvR5Gs6IUvxN2KVplL5a7VAlTM vHd0KoR1o2osVDNJsxZxiIy5kRXj0fbmd.OPIo.pJ7gWdhP1.kbAOfkrO9r3ED4t1lCH3SzrNn3M HMH6oJkfVzQsFX0fSTVIp1zdPnnvytLM2Z4UWIj.D6Gleyah2oPCL4pJ3CF2oILWhIX0mm_0OYd. 0gudA82_pXaoOFovF_k.DqqjVE4jcDtNGdSf0fl_OgxBgE0ngJZHWhxGqdH1qPZON6ZfVeLts6Hm mbL4tFRe1jMfuYzOIoLzdEhaKNLQDe.rvXWlgtAnDKXi4AdFvsIUJgvuF7ltQau_l5.7PYJJz0yA BSTzhvjQRRORhRB_UEovAWch9rJLJaSL8QkP2HwuFkDFGkgEyXHtZZ7SWaMqHebNf0ZPqZsCvkBd .sx6fwaxZUuk99.9l63.gcOkw892Mkr_vbnjqJbybpVqdFQUH9X6c7PC9eqCxwpXy8PkIYcdLc4. yVg-- X-Sonic-MF: X-Sonic-ID: 2e6ff3c7-6420-40ec-8dc2-1d030a981553 Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic306.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:50:37 +0000 Received: by hermes--production-gq1-5dd4b47f46-whghm (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 0edcebb489114b7eb19050e37e53adbe; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.400.131.1.6\)) Subject: Re: Are pourdiere VMs memory-limited? From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <95F83853-303A-4435-A647-BBF81A874E94@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 01:50:22 -0800 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <3C48C902-B55A-49F7-8D9A-BE52BEE27CEB.ref@yahoo.com> <3C48C902-B55A-49F7-8D9A-BE52BEE27CEB@yahoo.com> <5c4376d4-9f09-40be-8c63-93619b104b81@FreeBSD.org> <95F83853-303A-4435-A647-BBF81A874E94@yahoo.com> To: Yuri X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.400.131.1.6) X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.50 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RBL_SENDERSCORE_REPUT_8(0.00)[98.137.68.82:from]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.68.82:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.68.82:from] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z1bZl69kjz3sM5 X-Spamd-Bar: -- On Feb 24, 2025, at 00:36, Mark Millard wrote: > On Feb 23, 2025, at 22:14, Yuri wrote: >=20 >> On 2/23/25 21:46, Mark Millard wrote: >>> What port/package? >>=20 >> finance/hyperswitch in arm64. >>=20 >> It builds in a very high memory (20GB) on amd64, which is probably = what causes runaway builds on arm64. >=20 > For the bulk -ca with 14 builders for 14 VM cores on the M4 Max, each > builder allowed: 14 processes : >=20 >=20 > build of finance/hyperswitch | hyperswitch-2024.12.23.0_1 ended at = 2025-02-17T11:36:22-08:00 > build time: 01:14:38 >=20 >=20 > It likely had 13 other builders competing for cores over much of that = time. > By itself it would have taken less time. (High load averages.) >=20 > I could potentially force a rebuild by itself and monitor its RAM+SWAP = use, > which would be for the core count involved in my context. Also, the = time > scale factor would give a clue about the load average ratio. Note: Context is UFS, not ZFS. So no ARC RAM use. USE_TMPFS=3Dall NOTE: hyperswitch is not in my TMPFS_BLACKLIST (yet?). [00:00:49] [02] [00:00:00] Building finance/hyperswitch | = hyperswitch-2024.12.23.0_1 [00:24:44] [02] [00:23:55] Finished finance/hyperswitch | = hyperswitch-2024.12.23.0_1: Success ending TMPFS: 12.65 GiB So: a little under 24 min when run by itself. Various "MaxObs(erved)" figures are: load averages: . . . MaxObs: 9.86, 3.17, 1.76 Note: It spends lots of time under 1.5. It is not a heavily parallel type of processing. Mem: . . . 43057Mi MaxObsActive, 3103Mi MaxObsWired, 45479Mi = MaxObs(Act+Wir+Lndry) Swap: . . . 43057Mi MaxObs(Act+Lndry+SwapUsed), 45479Mi = MaxObs(A+Wir+L+SU), 60897Mi (A+W+L+SU+InAct) Note: The (A+W+L+SU+InAct) figure is from the MaxObs(A+Wir+L+SU) time = frame instead of being a MaxObs figure. Note: Lndry (L) always observed as 0; SwapUsed (SU) always observed as = 0. (Plenty of RAM.) Note: it is unclear what the dirty vs. clean pages counts are for the difference 60897Mi - 45479Mi. Clean pages could have been freed based on RAM pressure otherwise. So: up to possibly near 59.47+12.65 =3D=3D 72.12 GiBytes of RAM+SWAP = required. But likely more than 44.41+12.65 =3D=3D 57.06 GiByes of RAM+SWAP = required. That is for: USE_TMPFS=3Dall That might not match the official builders. If I ran it with RAM at 40 GiBytes in the VM, then the RAM pressure = would make the RAM+SWAP figure have a much narrower range. But that should be with a realistic USE_TMPFS status as well if such a test is made. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com From nobody Tue Feb 25 03:51:36 2025 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z23Z20RFWz5pMnt for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 03:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z23Z12fy2z3nYC for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 03:51:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1740455497; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bVXdVkXcE898QsvwxM4AyYOBv6zs5y34VeCh71YpK7cxJgs8SDBHnzzS6+jeL9fvGJ/Te2 AQiSMLEbFCutq2fQYttJtLSROrvvyQ3a3h76WZQzV74sL2IPCvARztKzbKA+nIe8uDTPHi b2xht9JR0dxVrKbYFSgiUo56yXT2ClJVOqkkIz8O+6lmojyEYoIPaj90Q7fknYL6bSSADj TLB9UzAQQpgoTKmhoefR1ik3MGA1D7rpcOhqvf1JCxbvVTDsPKZJFlR/E9nupJjhZ+87jC 80NXO2HUlO8R5h69T6xEkvtCB/EmDrsXWRFcqdIWhN3jSvjlwLsbMUETt3zrYA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740455497; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=arQOyaWqtbJj+PVCHehMXxF1650R1HCpcG9eMGi6o+s=; b=GeoqrsDkJbHtGHrBrDRCtTVVp0egfyKJE7WKevojK3QbL/MTpDpqyrYBXP0vn17SzmPeYT bEewGgsHWWNebEq0Gt7o/avqkHzhdY8M6S29LFskizRz6kOT0ts8HwPpVXw3JMQwQTJvRG HsnlmVqlsEqda7Qpwj9XMIMxTRYoGZCregSgdt8h/ErUKUhOvJq72CDcFUNFnW5bS056a1 cWDumYso36PvViuKwz+WwNWi2bOXcfJ8TvNGtzMnX83pCoVquEOj/zy6pVc4IVJxmMfBoA M0p17mvppY3SyMdFzOXBPMum2cdI9gjsNlsR6X4ZcRmFjUlKlhkhaqKV/l217A== Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z23Z108mSz182c for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 03:51:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTP id 51P3pao5036428 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 03:51:36 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 51P3pabq036427; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 03:51:36 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202502250351.51P3pabq036427@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 03:51:36 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this port. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. An e-mail will not be sent again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ benchmarks/perftest | 4.5-0.17 | 25.01.0-0.80 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Tue Feb 25 14:52:23 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z2LDg29vgz5q1Mg for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z2LDg1HXWz3NWM; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740495155; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sIf8buNtyjbpxR02kav/m+O5dndpGYksZWps4BF3yQ4=; b=KAm1adObATHM/EEg2x6C70dC1fuv/+UKJZx9+xSXj3TMJtPtXkmFQZTKr3fA86rLHzSvfO uryXMk3N7vuBSM7IQNGWlywgSSgBoMBT0WBJ1eCHQi5LOtDbcau94zufjmD+nUlJ03gZbH tIh2LyRwPD3nh6u0hwNxQsE30hy0348s0lt1Zuxb/WzOj/l1MJnEPAVMQf2C1AamqBxQKW 3rlGbxxD4dFT+Er1OTXW1tVm/QuxyyWW8HmJ/lGGElYoe7/AMw6RZBJSZN+UzSQcY2fpm5 R492OdKKqgfUqALiTEQimNDvv7J+Ekb9IYifKurqwBYq7QT2ghI8bsRUULn1mg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1740495155; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=aXSF4EZylmzBJ5zZOYSTGdxliCTvt02dkJ84une8XirPnEayR0RDXUx+zbfrYxvAlSpk7H eCayWyarmtMDGcuTBAiZZ74xnYs2n6s7cQSEgvnlZ2tfmgG3U1N7rtpMBGRhgLPesX/bcx psSAjWdmk8HCQYVtpNqKEx+iffPqS5yXZIQJt53v56TmrI/CyVa60sARZOFPLVwyfmb2f3 NkW/0fAwbh+9nyXztof4k/9o8UiZ1aJYCkspJUhpyzB9Fee0zS+9qJdLVIaKLq2iXXCX/J KtWfYhgYWzyrouPLSN7VLIk6ifD1cqloY2yPKa8NATqF4vxXnV4vLvpsEyl6fA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740495155; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sIf8buNtyjbpxR02kav/m+O5dndpGYksZWps4BF3yQ4=; b=xUUmf/ly9RPZKAJAC4HctrLsVgKaI8JQMOmkPGw5WU6W8VeIeMWKcb+9WuoYmb1gLdYvq5 rx0RqoiK7qG0UILLOeOS5M039mHaXzEPP9bKQEIIp+VV6TK2loeywvGiC5OqCsU+gmBe2j 3tZ5HDtOlDPJoAO8caupoEU/84K1/6BPK/pBSV6x5yPHPuvd5a9YmGYDPqc6C316kLYmV9 bxMtPde04m/two1itXTGjznNq87DTU6HY0HTwnhnwKb3nwKAdaSIZihMsKAtysNL3Zqqrp py+8ICThCzryWy04vHI3pxPLl73dMpViNe7iXH2gebGQst8RQiNd3kTUOn28+A== Received: from mail-qt1-f176.google.com (mail-qt1-f176.google.com [209.85.160.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: eduardo) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Z2LDg0cFJz6wS; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-qt1-f176.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-47218738a01so1650351cf.1; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 06:52:35 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyMyn7OaZf3MrGoYEiJ6rO4sn99yWWJYkdObhvqUaYdLQcfVuzT bSdfjp9HrRxsl+PWOcb7MwuSM6cPyUFDH2yKwe/bln/+B435lPyBdngvqK0E9fQePzBLf45qSr5 rHLTGYJqAssbjnChM+HXC19Zmjcw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGj49jKcOiU+AR6D2IUyIvlshPNnlZ7udCoBZaYJ6ri4kZYCXZiOf2x4gX82WyTPjQL5tWqYv5KsnG0L+049LI= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1788:b0:472:6bd:f620 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-472228bd99dmr90256871cf.5.1740495154627; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 06:52:34 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <86pllya7ch.fsf@ltc.des.dev> In-Reply-To: <86pllya7ch.fsf@ltc.des.dev> From: Nuno Teixeira Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:52:23 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-Gm-Features: AWEUYZllcP7wf9A9G9jgf1m9dBvyqTAkvDjzI4N7FZAoIGrh0Ceg07FjO7azBH0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: /etc/localtime symlink in poudriere jails To: =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006cd714062ef89b2f" --0000000000006cd714062ef89b2f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Des, I have a good candidate to test failure with /etc/localtime absence: devel/R-cran-data.table Current version 1.17.0 has: # Tests needs /etc/locatime symlink defined to succeed (# and C.UTF-8 env set: MAKE_ENV=3D LC_ALL=3DC.UTF-8) I still don't know the best way to demonstrate this to upstream. Thanks, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav escreveu (quarta, 11/12/2024 =C3= =A0(s) 09:37): > Nuno Teixeira writes: > > I'm trying to find why there is no /etc/localtime in poudriere jails > > and I need to create manually a symlink for some R-cran tests inside > > interactive jail. > > This shouldn't matter. The correct behavior if /etc/localtime is > missing is to assume UTC; if the tests don't do that then they are > broken and need to be fixed. Can you provide logs, or a step-by-step > procedure to reproduce the problem? > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@FreeBSD.org > --=20 Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org --0000000000006cd714062ef89b2f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Des,

I have a good can= didate to test failure with /etc/localtime absence: devel/R-cran-data.table=
Current version 1.17.0 has:

# Tests nee= ds /etc/locatime symlink defined to succeed
(# and C.UTF-8 env set:
M= AKE_ENV=3D =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 LC_ALL=3DC.UTF-8)

= I still don't know the best way to demonstrate this to upstream.
Thanks,

Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <= ;des@freebsd.org> escreveu (quart= a, 11/12/2024 =C3=A0(s) 09:37):
Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> writes:
> I'm trying to find why there is no /etc/localtime in poudriere jai= ls
> and I need to create manually a symlink for some R-cran tests inside > interactive jail.

This shouldn't matter.=C2=A0 The correct behavior if /etc/localtime is<= br> missing is to assume UTC; if the tests don't do that then they are
broken and need to be fixed.=C2=A0 Can you provide logs, or a step-by-step<= br> procedure to reproduce the problem?

DES
--
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@FreeBSD.org


--
Nuno Teixeira
=
FreeBSD UNIX:=C2=A0 <eduardo@FreeBSD.org>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Web:=C2=A0 https://Fr= eeBSD.org
--0000000000006cd714062ef89b2f-- From nobody Tue Feb 25 15:32:11 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z2M6h1gSwz5q4Lx for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:32:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ps.ports@smyrak.com) Received: from ipv6.s149.cyber-folks.pl (ipv6.s149.cyber-folks.pl [IPv6:2a02:1778::113:254]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z2M6f2PJWz3lrL for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ps.ports@smyrak.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=smyrak.com header.s=x header.b="j Lmita7"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=smyrak.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ps.ports@smyrak.com designates 2a02:1778::113:254 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ps.ports@smyrak.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smyrak.com; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject :To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PziJAj1BDdZ9vmE9kWIL5QMYaI4YYeZrvuKX3M5nyKc=; b=j Lmita7qK/Uf1gQRlzDY6SEzu5uQwKgnyqzlT2jtx8rhXvvfJ4j3Ovp+Cqq+o//3AmatNC4OYF3Sja 2MhLEvOnrJIaQrPsktdr/VqzdBgF4c3RqlQfgwf3yN9PDk754NMRw4gLeuLyeczKgeM493Q/8fa7Z xgpoFuzT1tpqM/JLSUGsFguPDON1N5oSg/dTRo5Zjybb8Xb3EFhk/qBq6QMPkIHttrtQamIAXw2af FOx1ZoRh0qju/hn76iIK3oU4ckvsJKX6QPToPvdqrcX/zy1EZmu18tDBSG0SM/OFMGWwL/xWvvK9F 6BKZgxuLr9gL1XdDYB4FQ6EP1FWsFPDjw==; Received: from 93-181-165-201.internetia.net.pl ([93.181.165.201] helo=daleth.home) by s149.cyber-folks.pl with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.1) (envelope-from ) id 1tmwv3-00000000YnQ-0wSa for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:32:25 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 16:32:11 +0100 From: Piotr Smyrak To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: PR 277510 Message-ID: <20250225163211.50161e0a@daleth.home> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Id: piero@smyrak.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.62 / 15.00]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.993]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.91)[0.910]; SUBJ_ALL_CAPS(0.68)[9]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[smyrak.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.36)[-0.361]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:1778::113:0/116]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.20)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ASN(0.00)[asn:41079, ipnet:2a02:1778::/48, country:PL]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[smyrak.com:s=x]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[smyrak.com:~] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z2M6f2PJWz3lrL X-Spamd-Bar: + Hi, I am looking for a committer to look at PR #277510, which was failed as a compile breakage of x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel. The issue, which it describes, seem to has been a returning problem in various ports. I have submitted an additional patch to the port in Bugzilla, as well as pull request on GitHub if this is more suitable these days (ref. smyru-xf86-video-intel-compile-fix). Thanks, -- Piotr Smyrak From nobody Wed Feb 26 03:52:55 2025 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z2gY40Xhbz5pb36 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z2gY35g2tz3j0C for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:52:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1740541975; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QeCJG00ZJT7MpoDbb0Wa/piM+bJDq9FVF3p915OLBqAibqeSbzQtYvZRL+T4beijiIefIH miUNaQ67NsbxR6/IF6jLaq04baWqIRY5WorExt8PKCxWHAkvcRI/BfeESqaAGInc+kZkCI tLz1dA4KLtu4d1dmIPHDEMfzvmww0eI82sHBtqz3gyOqmP+bKZu7sNLWkKodG1tYI1W8dG sRWj5bZj0tPJns5w9f+dEwjJjQppyj2EGeQsm7mJUSl/O757O15rtXj0WeggCtgtNuEZ2L LcgbloeqF3ZBRx+x3tM54zEDOT6CMOpc5jUyFT4Giy6gVR0p6BNLYhWIpzI9EA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740541975; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GgJAFNGyI9RWXBVuayYbRlF95Ir+lxIG3sp6+89x8TU=; b=lwtJqkk9MoSrxXR8dfV6zS6B2jydDT6J2hAy7lLDE3jbIfwyPQD0mze9MsekpfY9WqwHB7 0FE6ad0oh8Juy4K9pPcjSVVknSE/oGoUY/XA168PQLc4lvXLg/txTMVxBKqpKb5mlPftg/ +ZwFYtY7HZi3BS17uJV21vz2rL2mCmZ7lbCUViJMbE68v5lRZmpT4yVmhdrukBZEz0sCRm 8PaXM1bN20eP3XvLMULkODJ80vSdBkX+LPzdacDysogvqiVLKliHqWYSmiRPIBkI+BS3JE zViJZCrwj/RrTJt4B5Pv/BZZJfRRjpRwq4QPe7y/i4+a0tG0UbgLWDXlecQ8KQ== Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z2gY34b7tzwgp for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:52:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTP id 51Q3qtlf023262 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:52:55 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 51Q3qtGZ023261; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:52:55 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202502260352.51Q3qtGZ023261@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 03:52:55 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this port. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. An e-mail will not be sent again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/clickhouse | 22.1.3.7 | v25.1.6.34-stable ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/etcd34 | 3.4.18 | v3.4.36 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/py-archinfo | 9.0.5405 | v9.2.144 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/libretro-pcsx_rearmed | 0.20231025 | r25l ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ math/py-claripy | 9.0.5405 | v9.2.144 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ security/py-angr | 9.0.5405 | v9.2.144 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ security/py-pyvex | 9.0.5405 | v9.2.144 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ textproc/redisearch | 2.2.10 | v2.10.13 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/tikiwiki | 24.2 | 28.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Wed Feb 26 06:50:49 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z2lVP2TMMz5pSLj for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 06:50:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: from lena.kiev.ua (lena.kiev.ua [185.45.113.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z2lVM651Fz3grQ for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 06:50:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=lena.kiev.ua header.s=5 header.b=my+FhpiX; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=lena.kiev.ua; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of Lena@lena.kiev.ua designates 185.45.113.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=Lena@lena.kiev.ua DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lena.kiev.ua; s=5; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From: Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References; bh=vlRZaM36a2cBLlAeb5CVDY1LxpGk8jPZxyL3o5cfnew=; b=my+FhpiXjsF7Wss6BHByodkKst lMertPL9pS9HVjDTJc2ufbZM0y6SnzGAv6L5G+Fk07K6yqWLDhkUXl0vaGBhGByoul84ENRH2DKTA FzfRGIa6Hj7VPTNp5ENUpE7u312J8ZbIfECpu5djGc/Lyvxamm/j/aN/nvvPfqDv0bTMT/qiyrtcx uonIe5Wz5CED3cHv71M6VetxeCzUYowhHFMjPY/ZFiWWFBvjGn4InAboi2wSyDBZtGwnqN/QTxdQ9 rJ2WMCeREevYT01mkndUN9vUXuhKRQQP17tupKQp/o66jqhWUcEvTDJhGBxjg8g51B9QdwVUYd2rc g+b38s3w==; Received: from ip-1926.rusanovka-net.kiev.ua ([94.244.25.38] helo=bedside.lena.kiev.ua) by lena.kiev.ua with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1tnBFr-00000000NpO-3lZf for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:50:52 +0200 Received: from bedside.lena.kiev.ua (localhost.lena.kiev.ua [127.0.0.1]) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 51Q6on9j003875 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:50:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: (from lena@localhost) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 51Q6onvB003874 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:50:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:50:49 +0200 From: Lena@lena.kiev.ua To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: beefy16 package builder stuck Message-ID: <20250226065049.GB1096@lena.kiev> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Return-Receipt-To: Lena@lena.kiev.ua X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.44 / 15.00]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[lena.kiev.ua:dkim]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.995]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.97)[0.974]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.71)[-0.705]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[lena.kiev.ua,none]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[lena.kiev.ua:s=5]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[185.45.113.66:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29141, ipnet:185.45.112.0/22, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[lena.kiev.ua:+] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z2lVM651Fz3grQ X-Spamd-Bar: -- Package builder beefy16 (13.4 amd64 default) is stuck since Feb 17 (199 hours) at "patch" for a port without patches and "NO_BUILD=yes": https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy16/build.html?mastername=134amd64-default&build=da5207f3c65e https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy16/data/134amd64-default/da5207f3c65e/logs/ko-ko.TeX-fonts-extra-0.1.0_6.log Is there some watchdog? From nobody Wed Feb 26 08:31:41 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z2nky4Lttz5pfKM for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z2nky3Z3Dz3Mkt; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740558714; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/z5XSTM3YcP2SHH4XIWOFN69ddx8ioTSNqw4Fb2scRE=; b=gwDql8BrmAcpNLicuNLoy0IkoJDh+MwOJQOkGA4TyIXG1hKgIjHlfzhY+wtxP0CFS4eRHg Z+pdIiVjJ3RoB5G/tjBEB/KvHsJq1KdAemrM2NZfsJ6fGCYmzsrLoYiLBrtV5cpe0V9AKS iilTwk0OdaI2k7Ul9ppTkyj79ynbbHXKnh9mr1K5vq7CY4QhkLvaqt2RywztLGsDbcwhI9 /JxnbERN5LpeAO2Bohqms7rzx7vUArvIDQ63h3J6QXfwJOPTI9DtWKIOjqR74LS7px2EaI m5S+Wdl1x/84Mj6tMM3QNIq9qeBDzk3iCkvc+TMfWO6pxplYHy4eyzZ1ITEkAA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1740558714; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=VE5sks4OMrZe4GHNpjdj14ObvPCE2na4iM4VnX5G7isoLpGNTNx9oSX+fMTXjCX+YzRxZC +HtxBI92po9hgJAfQUMFA5obLn+166gqkyf9q7Kq/epehXD3GGIZ0SXvyk4XqYMFk6ZOFK eD68AyHETry79M0xxq6ZU8NxMfmCrLDmqomyzdge+qA7PhQWs4MFuds6L6O+5t+KTJ6QKA 3i148sY10W6zJNmR6BfQk1/EHgJu+2/rMslSU2Q/59Ge+9m9MIt9/fGVAinMIsKhPChlv+ fw2KUfbIA0xUVeephPTMv7/wedjTjDYGexLgJ/8Xakxe7b+66rQBKurZHb+Jsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740558714; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/z5XSTM3YcP2SHH4XIWOFN69ddx8ioTSNqw4Fb2scRE=; b=WjqdyQKmf0bP3Bg6I4D1DNy3W3Jhsg94yGcS3kwyTl9Vi/Zj/kJrtws/tc7XTL4SSOkyT2 UJEV99i7ZTaHTsDi2M2+kmFqP9d8J7vpY+whu7/akB6Tn3V4NOjVTl/T1HaSgBh37jlUvh QcM7oBM+20z9iZKPuakuZM2cRVZDtk4bedLf6xx/ygpB1t2UnUhkNSn01otGxWqBsB4a8B 5iomoqXkBaMofQGzHrNEzghQptjmaAYyFB+s2IzTIMTFlr+BVQgvs0VycqIAdu4h9p4tE6 S+kjtNj2vf/rMIM8HibttNZFGjppUbCBcw3stQSRvWgSL+twjxOX8Kh36wR53g== Received: from mail-qt1-f176.google.com (mail-qt1-f176.google.com [209.85.160.176]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: eduardo) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Z2nky1d1gzmW3; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eduardo@freebsd.org) Received: by mail-qt1-f176.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-471feaace60so6261291cf.3; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:31:54 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUBqH5BP2LvC4ByPhFn5o8sn7BzQ5mVjb+bfccvshuKGDyN6X34fC9eDMXeL9NnRkBClvs=@freebsd.org, AJvYcCUmCqE3dyIcObnQh7evlugAkU0VxDJ1tXWUvqT9Y0QGOx7RKxad0Vg9e6Vv649ctTalm3iwxbnTyQ==@freebsd.org, AJvYcCUnRlkexPE+JXueDBoZhuELxVz1Sfw9feO4XzmmXolw1PWDCskp4BSDwtyzKOjGlH/Xl5991VSETiSMXFyvjQ==@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyERg5QDRkh4yg/zIdT2kKTK7Ch/uLDQeoZGN0m7cZCWwP4VPZJ e8MDpfc83rkkx7l9u+k6jw9emJkjbpCqCoNwcvYCxJalf7DRqJR4xPJnq1BuoWY23a8WySEqrsj IENkaHr/v3BYEcK1kjYA917NZu5I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHruuZPjBrVGaWrLECGlvUHHNrRXvzoR9jG6G/H9ruo/vUIrHaS0Tww41yOo0o96QmeEDbGlQg0k11VajfAOf8= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5ac5:0:b0:472:c7f:a97a with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-472228af09amr106245761cf.1.1740558713726; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 00:31:53 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <68bbf05d-1d4a-4819-bb83-be6c4f002a63@gwdg.de> <7fb64cac-9b09-4235-9235-2bfb6c228442@gwdg.de> <4de598b1-a576-4ac6-949c-63d1065d818d@madpilot.net> <644c3cfe-6135-4e26-9043-602a10ce041a@madpilot.net> <4b06a292-272f-4d9c-b3ea-177478876821@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <4b06a292-272f-4d9c-b3ea-177478876821@madpilot.net> From: Nuno Teixeira Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:31:41 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-Gm-Features: AWEUYZki8Pp2zqeE8hwHj1nd_sPGK5QgNGsQ6c3n-1_Mv0x24MVUPUsDN4SET2o Message-ID: Subject: Re: poudriere loop: llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase To: Guido Falsi Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , "Hurling, Rainer" , Dimitry Andric , FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d7b5b1062f07675f" --000000000000d7b5b1062f07675f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Same with pkg-2.0.99.5 and poudriere-devel-3.4.99.20250209: > testport 2 times on net/speedtest-go [00:00:06] [01] [00:00:00] Inspecting ports-mgmt/pkg-devel | pkg-2.0.99.5: determining shlib requirements [00:00:06] [01] [00:00:00] Inspecting lang/go121 | go121-1.21.13_1: determining shlib requirements [00:00:06] [01] [00:00:00] Warning: go121-1.21.13_1 will be rebuilt as it misses libc.so.6:32 [00:00:06] [01] [00:00:00] Building lang/go121 | go121-1.21.13_1: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase *Not* getting loop so far: Warning: llvm19-19.1.7 will be rebuilt as it misses libc++.so.1:32 Building devel/llvm19@default | llvm19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase Guido Falsi escreveu (quinta, 13/02/2025 =C3=A0(s) 07:18= ): > > > On 11/02/25 21:53, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > (...) > > > > pkg 2.0.6 doesn't solve issue with go: > > > > testport 2 times on net/speedtest-go > > > > [00:00:03] [01] [00:00:00] Inspecting ports-mgmt/pkg | pkg-2.0.6: > > determining shlib requirements > > [00:00:03] [01] [00:00:00] Inspecting lang/go121 | go121-1.21.13_1: > > determining shlib requirements > > [00:00:03] [01] [00:00:00] Warning: go121-1.21.13_1 will be rebuilt as > > it misses libc.so.6:32 > > [00:00:03] [01] [00:00:00] Building lang/go121 | go121-1.21.13_1: > > missed shlib PORTREVISION chase > > I can confirm that the go ports stubbornly insist on displaying this > behaviour. > > -- > Guido Falsi > > --=20 Nuno Teixeira FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org --000000000000d7b5b1062f07675f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Same with pkg-2.0.99.5 and poudriere-devel-3.4.99.202= 50209:

> testport 2 ti= mes on net/speedtest-go

[00:00:06] [01] [00= :00:00] Inspecting ports-mgmt/pkg-devel | pkg-2.0.99.5: determining shlib r= equirements
[00:00:06] [01] [00:00:00] Inspecting lang/go121 | go121-1.2= 1.13_1: determining shlib requirements
[00:00:06] [01] [00:00:00] Warnin= g: go121-1.21.13_1 will be rebuilt as it misses libc.so.6:32
[00:00:06] = [01] [00:00:00] Building =C2=A0 lang/go121 | go121-1.21.13_1: missed shlib = PORTREVISION chase

*Not* getting loop so far:

Warning: llvm19-19.1.7 will be rebuilt as it miss= es libc++.so.1:32
Building =C2=A0 devel/llvm19@default | llvm= 19-19.1.7: missed shlib PORTREVISION chase




--
Nuno Teixeira
=
FreeBSD UNIX:=C2=A0 <eduardo@FreeBSD.org>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Web:=C2=A0 https://Fr= eeBSD.org
--000000000000d7b5b1062f07675f-- From nobody Wed Feb 26 21:25:20 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z36vS015wz5nx6x for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 21:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z36vQ2jdzz3xc6 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 21:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=troutmask.apl.washington.edu header.s=troutmask header.b=jLYL9ayN; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF" header.from=washington.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.95.76.21) smtp.mailfrom=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 51QLPKn1038552 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:25:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 troutmask.apl.washington.edu 51QLPKn1038552 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=troutmask.apl.washington.edu; s=troutmask; t=1740605120; bh=ppCAOySDSZXNQDGSQjDBTkg+3QzbP0E/n72gkzz1/Ls=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Reply-To:From; b=jLYL9ayNc7M0AV5+HnyhOEZSIc3uDu2nv05TwpW8qGJS4AVDdjDIWdPHqJe2YblLI Xq7WuADw81V06KdIQwmAaCrC3U/qHjsom3H07aX78umz4Zia7dDY6u17ju1pTakSL7 x9uUGeZPeWtslcgM8E19H4nbvI0hgGT6T98GOJL99mj0LRb89F8ZayIHMqZUwfrDSl e/zHH0r7E8BNQmZckOcpmTLxMpAfd6nbh4wDkpmwPdFS52SzdXrHkCoRji7QJAJGov +E+UaHOC/zINHLuTspg1j4LElBHELbnfzF4kiyu86K6oztVaC9WswflzpDYaDCoPIz AKB4JpPGRvhkQ== Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 51QLPKjP038551 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:25:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:25:20 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: phantom version numbers? Message-ID: Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.94 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.990]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.57)[0.567]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.42)[-0.419]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[128.95.76.21:from]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[washington.edu : No valid SPF,none]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[troutmask.apl.washington.edu:s=troutmask]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_TO_DOM(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[troutmask.apl.washington.edu:~]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z36vQ2jdzz3xc6 X-Spamd-Bar: + Recently update a freebsd-current system and all ports. Prior to updating the ports, I did % cd /usr/ports % git pull -ff % make fetchindex After the update I see, % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) OK, first, attempt, % portmaster -Byd drm-515-kmod % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) Second, attempt, % cd /usr/ports % git reset --hard % make fetchindex % cd graphics/drm-515-kmod % make clean && make % pkg delete -f drm-515-kmod % make install && make clean % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) Ok, so where is 1500033_3 coming from? -- Steve From nobody Wed Feb 26 22:28:41 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z38Jj69l4z5p433 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 22:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www121.sakura.ne.jp (www121.sakura.ne.jp [153.125.133.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z38Jj1bl1z3r7r for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 22:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from kalamity.joker.local (124-18-40-20.area1c.commufa.jp [124.18.40.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by www121.sakura.ne.jp (8.17.1/8.17.1/[SAKURA-WEB]/20201212) with ESMTPA id 51QMSfXG031133; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 07:28:42 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dec.sakura.ne.jp; s=s2405; t=1740608922; bh=foUvx0RWEnURGZkO1kmqDYXF1Rlf+hCX6pzOXhSTqIg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=UI3VkW47/3pDPBMeq7msAzaUC674xr6SWl8tAFwC6c48FOCBV+py7U1ND4k173WXq a9sXd1rMsPWbisItC1x6zuShdyEfA+f/Pj6OrpskZgCqX9rPwOHrHY/W8YIgZxnF9P W0sAlkiECKtHmfm6obbkj4xsgS9G+jrnkz+UzZqE= Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 07:28:41 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: phantom version numbers? Message-Id: <20250227072841.186df1199a23a0e813ccb047@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.2) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7684, ipnet:153.125.128.0/18, country:JP] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z38Jj1bl1z3r7r X-Spamd-Bar: ---- On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:25:20 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > Recently update a freebsd-current system and all ports. > Prior to updating the ports, I did > > % cd /usr/ports > % git pull -ff > % make fetchindex > > After the update I see, > > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > OK, first, attempt, > > % portmaster -Byd drm-515-kmod > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > Second, attempt, > > % cd /usr/ports > % git reset --hard > % make fetchindex > % cd graphics/drm-515-kmod > % make clean && make > % pkg delete -f drm-515-kmod > % make install && make clean > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > Ok, so where is 1500033_3 coming from? > > > -- > Steve Would be: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/Mk/Uses/kmod.mk?id=a5fc087131e66513d1c74f8427c924afff580a15 and https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/graphics/drm-515-kmod/Makefile#n3 -- Tomoaki AOKI From nobody Wed Feb 26 22:42:14 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z38cJ2t92z5p5cl for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 22:42:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z38cH0t3Rz42jk for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 22:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 51QMgFNU080744; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:42:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 troutmask.apl.washington.edu 51QMgFNU080744 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=troutmask.apl.washington.edu; s=troutmask; t=1740609735; bh=FOlob+Bml13A/++hymhS4qFbX0HwAfYfA2E75XmdCFQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=k9PkQ6V5RVHuo3JJaV0svM41SdWYlyM3MqVtfFC+mvrvyzKX4iNQuON1M46y9zOka jqMWf8Mo2yfXtmkghNBEhGR85MBSH8TS0o9Hx5BKXp7k2kS6CbggC3UQJs5btcBBz9 qyX13QrDTH+Z9B36W76q1kfuT+Q5HM2D5avTFT/v5oeozhfqPfMzRCDjNZ7xLK3HBV cXWNFXdkyt6j2zYgyqbKaodsLwrwLFgBwj/hO3AFBEBZjYxN+ljyN5NOgBNR3A8MdM dvQnKxizk0FUY9oTpaAnc7rC/eWrAhe0B/BMZWPUrTKJzjV7N2hYESfo/w0GEaswUW tj14Ru2aaupQA== Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 51QMgEPg080743; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:42:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:42:14 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Tomoaki AOKI Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: phantom version numbers? Message-ID: Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20250227072841.186df1199a23a0e813ccb047@dec.sakura.ne.jp> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250227072841.186df1199a23a0e813ccb047@dec.sakura.ne.jp> X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z38cH0t3Rz42jk X-Spamd-Bar: ---- On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 07:28:41AM +0900, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:25:20 -0800 > Steve Kargl wrote: > > > Recently update a freebsd-current system and all ports. > > Prior to updating the ports, I did > > > > % cd /usr/ports > > % git pull -ff > > % make fetchindex > > > > After the update I see, > > > > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > > > OK, first, attempt, > > > > % portmaster -Byd drm-515-kmod > > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > > > Second, attempt, > > > > % cd /usr/ports > > % git reset --hard > > % make fetchindex > > % cd graphics/drm-515-kmod > > % make clean && make > > % pkg delete -f drm-515-kmod > > % make install && make clean > > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > > > Ok, so where is 1500033_3 coming from? > > > > Would be: > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/Mk/Uses/kmod.mk?id=a5fc087131e66513d1c74f8427c924afff580a15 > > and > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/graphics/drm-515-kmod/Makefile#n3 > And why is drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 not being updated to 5.15.160.1500033_3? Hmmm, % sysctl -a | grep 15000 kern.osreldate: 1500031 % cat INDEX-15 | sed s/\ /\\n/g | grep drm-515-kmod | sed s/\|/\\n/ | head -1 drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500033_3 It seems ports/INDEX-15 is now completely useless. The former commit appears to be not too well thought out. -- Steve From nobody Wed Feb 26 23:08:01 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z39B03d2Bz5p7lf for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 23:08:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z399z1TTwz3M4F for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 23:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=troutmask.apl.washington.edu header.s=troutmask header.b=Xxf5Lqoo; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF" header.from=washington.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.95.76.21) smtp.mailfrom=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 51QN81w8084405; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:08:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 troutmask.apl.washington.edu 51QN81w8084405 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=troutmask.apl.washington.edu; s=troutmask; t=1740611281; bh=EUo/Asv7Aaq5/3MVI9bRsgjFx+1ya36EFRvCcGgqGnQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Xxf5LqooHfDCKnBXGu37E2nJJ75QjV5luyM4a3egwU33xiQbTUgEKSuQTsqJlsDX9 fyYBmO55kqVPT5XvaLNm4+eZYN1mZe68ecVnLDUfh7ghwb/nV4snXj8Uxutyl8Ahhn i4T40LG6bWD4Pj3J9MjaRLITV5KYeWQW4OywM6ZbMXLQirJwMi8B3seAJNAnbUcRS6 /xlvFRnbtkwdVpu6rPpD27DQTR75Ax9kExGtNhY1WiFi6kT2by1wUiLVwrO9KXEbij xMrMxMKhlnFzQr55f6yeFMXhmggzVuQVM59TMG7FPWgqUogRyGTIp2QVfVbXqGHdv4 lHmtO6a1Rn+XA== Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 51QN81Tw084404; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:08:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:08:01 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Tomoaki AOKI Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: phantom version numbers? Message-ID: Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20250227072841.186df1199a23a0e813ccb047@dec.sakura.ne.jp> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.35 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.990]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.990]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.43)[-0.426]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[128.95.76.21:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[washington.edu : No valid SPF,none]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[troutmask.apl.washington.edu:s=troutmask]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_TO_DOM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[troutmask.apl.washington.edu:~]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z399z1TTwz3M4F X-Spamd-Bar: ++ On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 02:42:14PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 07:28:41AM +0900, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:25:20 -0800 > > Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > Recently update a freebsd-current system and all ports. > > > Prior to updating the ports, I did > > > > > > % cd /usr/ports > > > % git pull -ff > > > % make fetchindex > > > > > > After the update I see, > > > > > > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > > > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > > > > > OK, first, attempt, > > > > > > % portmaster -Byd drm-515-kmod > > > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > > > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > > > > > Second, attempt, > > > > > > % cd /usr/ports > > > % git reset --hard > > > % make fetchindex > > > % cd graphics/drm-515-kmod > > > % make clean && make > > > % pkg delete -f drm-515-kmod > > > % make install && make clean > > > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > > > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > > > > > Ok, so where is 1500033_3 coming from? > > > > > > > Would be: > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/Mk/Uses/kmod.mk?id=a5fc087131e66513d1c74f8427c924afff580a15 > > > > and > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/graphics/drm-515-kmod/Makefile#n3 > > > > And why is drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 not being updated > to 5.15.160.1500033_3? Hmmm, > > % sysctl -a | grep 15000 > kern.osreldate: 1500031 > > % cat INDEX-15 | sed s/\ /\\n/g | grep drm-515-kmod | sed s/\|/\\n/ | head -1 > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500033_3 > > It seems ports/INDEX-15 is now completely useless. The former > commit appears to be not too well thought out. The fix for this gaff is % cat INDEX-15 | sed s/1500033/1500031/g > zxc % mv zxc INDEX-15 git revision a5fc087131e makes it much more challenging to track -current (ie., alpah/beta testers), because INDEX-15 and a running kernel are likely to conflicts with osreldate. -- Steve From nobody Thu Feb 27 03:51:05 2025 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z3HST6ZkWz5pPH8 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 03:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z3HST2LH7z49t8 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 03:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1740628265; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=OMQvvRxzgMFAjFiU7PTkOdnMzIlm5q1PvZPcq2m+V1JDF3QUlbi9ExBCZBGNIjU9unju6K 8NKrFmV+JKYQuhI7dsrCVAKS1NWWQDPCrKzV+A9XIHwRyHUmvK6KquMpU8NQTWh83lgtLx KxuSo5PIOj6ym7BookOBdpZ6O1tkU9jGBoxsS/tQIcL0BeHDtuzJPUU5PL8tYaa+IoyGKK 8kcY3ra+asFk3uaWtBxk/AYe/tdAIM4txj/iv4pmD9R4a5G1snVFZp0qJ2sE45OUM0QB7L EjPCBhI7ECQ5AddV6lSmInKu0HobkrlrD8XRhhut42SBbAWk/FbJxNSUhMIyYw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740628265; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EjDI+Ji0pYwVidITGrAXUeEFCAo0TMXbwK87Fy+Vfl8=; b=HiqAcXirwyKn56mERrNAS/NnwUmCW+kfI78sbvILio0tXOstbyG39JDvegW28El33X+ZMD EYPxcvLXoxUG+vU2RK1QAXgmPV/AFs2eKbONSTGaD8x1U76xpyxgIbwWV2xfwkRHBdAYOd NAI8KwXQQ5UasxrlUa4pZr5EBAbGRDbFoaMatBcRVOSwJqumaDyMasCtRNCk3mAtNstYh0 SG78D3ZFfD7d2JSyoNwd5whAZx/twwReViaDV71lZNQ7NPsvV6CuRpCPHeDJFEO//6skcq 5/LITcroovMi3+nI9or5c8ioPYgEC2ZXZmcblDSzEaemMqoWkxUQ3/vHxxCZjA== Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z3HST1yVdz9tf for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 03:51:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTP id 51R3p5No014220 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 03:51:05 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 51R3p5ON014219; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 03:51:05 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202502270351.51R3p5ON014219@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 03:51:05 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this port. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. An e-mail will not be sent again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/py-cle | 9.0.5405 | v9.2.144 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/remotebox | 3.2 | 3.5 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Thu Feb 27 18:52:17 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z3gST0Swrz59PW0 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:52:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z3gSR554Pz3NG9 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=troutmask.apl.washington.edu header.s=troutmask header.b=nVGhKIQT; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF" header.from=washington.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.95.76.21) smtp.mailfrom=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 51RIqHAu039831; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:52:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 troutmask.apl.washington.edu 51RIqHAu039831 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=troutmask.apl.washington.edu; s=troutmask; t=1740682337; bh=qpY6s/5OPKfPv0QebYi8vHL3O8Ee2Xa/PE11kSJZs/o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nVGhKIQTkfi91np1Q4xOzgstaVK1gOXvRMA9aH1C6HTZ4v+Yz8Ohem1bd8B2FGZJu 0zmYzUOnSnk4QjepRhCJOSME+SNnGWYp4tN7CbMDMn6uYPxiMlLHDfgORKeAQ6zJZ9 Frkrt9y8g1SWaHqlB1h+0b5AV+8vU556QPsw8JQwtl0VHb7fzWqjs69k9DN/lh2ZJ3 /FNVUw9dlgWEMrtt/fzskHZlH55XTPLIXSm4AQnyQ5VXwI+ZsHz9Aoqz3whmH1yWnS 4Aa+PQamIBlUUThZuQo5Vmu9R++yzvdzMBQdsvAYyfdy5JIAUaZY1yXf651+Xbxaw0 Wbr5e7Ag6RB0w== Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 51RIqHFJ039830; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:52:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:52:17 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Tomoaki AOKI Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: phantom version numbers? Message-ID: Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20250227072841.186df1199a23a0e813ccb047@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <20250227212756.dcee4e336d00845d38ee1179@dec.sakura.ne.jp> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250227212756.dcee4e336d00845d38ee1179@dec.sakura.ne.jp> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.19 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.993]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[128.95.76.21:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[washington.edu : No valid SPF,none]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[troutmask.apl.washington.edu:~]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_TO_DOM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[troutmask.apl.washington.edu:s=troutmask]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z3gSR554Pz3NG9 X-Spamd-Bar: -- On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:27:56PM +0900, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > Just a prediction, but possibly build cluster for main (15-Current) are > running on 1500033, while your build environment is running on 1500031. > That is exactly the problem. Someone tracking freebsd-current may have slightly different kernel running than the one used to biuld INDEX-15. In my case, I have % sysctl -a | grep osreldate kern.osreldate: 1500031 and INDEX-15 was built on a system with 1500033. > IIUC, the purpose of the kmod version string change is to provide > kmod pkgs for multiple minor releases (i.e., provide kmod pkgs for 14.2 > even until 14.1 is EoL'ed). IMHO, the solution is clearly wrong. INDEX-15 is only valid for short period of time. Hmmm, it seems that the Porter's Handbook https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#versions shows that __FreeBSD_version was changed to 1500030 on 2025-01-02. Newer numbers are not documented. My kernel is at 1500031 with a timestamp of kern.version: FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #0 main-n275407-e736f6df1ec1:\ Wed Feb 12 15:22:12 PST 2025 and INDEX-15 is from a system with 1500033. 'git blame' shows 05dfaadde4ae0 (Jean-Sébastien Pédron 2024-12-22 19:10:23 +0100 76)\ #define __FreeBSD_version 1500033 So, the timestamps don't make sense. Looking at the lists of version numbers in the Handbook and the large comment in sys/sys/params.h, it's clear that the last 3 digits should be trimmed. 1401 is a 14.1 system, 1402 is a 14.2 system, 1500 is freebsd-current, etc. -- Steve From nobody Thu Feb 27 12:27:56 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z3Vwz3Bhkz5q9Jj for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 12:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www121.sakura.ne.jp (www121.sakura.ne.jp [153.125.133.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z3Vwy686Nz3qy6 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 12:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from kalamity.joker.local (124-18-40-20.area1c.commufa.jp [124.18.40.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by www121.sakura.ne.jp (8.17.1/8.17.1/[SAKURA-WEB]/20201212) with ESMTPA id 51RCRuxC091078; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:27:57 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dec.sakura.ne.jp; s=s2405; t=1740659277; bh=Xxm7hnqVKyBYPkpZk2NroP7MUiplqihsJwhk5ZLT5rc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=UDi/UMVxH1LSxbblKxpTJTZcGfJaTqN67qy4xhJyOJ/Zz1Uv8hBVePQpe6fF4Mr0X 0rffg+CxhPpwWtdATLabvQSIM9JzclgDDYzN8K7pg1UFgsSRorlUEeaOMipluHl1pT lwgw+vF4adtHJEPgu3f5J8bVWUXTCLlivsO83/VY= Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:27:56 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: phantom version numbers? Message-Id: <20250227212756.dcee4e336d00845d38ee1179@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: <20250227072841.186df1199a23a0e813ccb047@dec.sakura.ne.jp> Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.2) List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7684, ipnet:153.125.128.0/18, country:JP] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z3Vwy686Nz3qy6 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:42:14 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 07:28:41AM +0900, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:25:20 -0800 > > Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > Recently update a freebsd-current system and all ports. > > > Prior to updating the ports, I did > > > > > > % cd /usr/ports > > > % git pull -ff > > > % make fetchindex > > > > > > After the update I see, > > > > > > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > > > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > > > > > OK, first, attempt, > > > > > > % portmaster -Byd drm-515-kmod > > > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > > > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > > > > > Second, attempt, > > > > > > % cd /usr/ports > > > % git reset --hard > > > % make fetchindex > > > % cd graphics/drm-515-kmod > > > % make clean && make > > > % pkg delete -f drm-515-kmod > > > % make install && make clean > > > % pkg version -vl '<' | grep drm > > > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 < needs updating (index has 5.15.160.1500033_3) > > > > > > Ok, so where is 1500033_3 coming from? > > > > > > > Would be: > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/Mk/Uses/kmod.mk?id=a5fc087131e66513d1c74f8427c924afff580a15 > > > > and > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/graphics/drm-515-kmod/Makefile#n3 > > > > And why is drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500031_3 not being updated > to 5.15.160.1500033_3? Hmmm, Just a prediction, but possibly build cluster for main (15-Current) are running on 1500033, while your build environment is running on 1500031. IIUC, the purpose of the kmod version string change is to provide kmod pkgs for multiple minor releases (i.e., provide kmod pkgs for 14.2 even until 14.1 is EoL'ed). So pkg needs to compare here sanely on upgrades and/or installations. (If not, kmod pkgs for 14.2 are installed even on systems running on 14.1, thus, at worst brick the computer until rescued with another installation including installer.) OTOH, version comparison alone is possibly not as precisely comparing versions as installations/upgrades. > > % sysctl -a | grep 15000 > kern.osreldate: 1500031 > > % cat INDEX-15 | sed s/\ /\\n/g | grep drm-515-kmod | sed s/\|/\\n/ | head -1 > drm-515-kmod-5.15.160.1500033_3 > > It seems ports/INDEX-15 is now completely useless. The former > commit appears to be not too well thought out. > > -- > Steve -- Tomoaki AOKI From nobody Fri Feb 28 03:53:58 2025 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z3vTS2JDXz5PDZk for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 03:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z3vTM07XFz3lm7 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 03:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1740714839; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=bvsGDqiCgdXwWw+iKiNNzM1s6myIsghqDTTu13+eXsrMRUAnhcMJ8d5JvSUaLsBARmW0t6 bCXcLw6EIC1eid3MvAKkegXEg3ZTdaMPxzQ5wk3x37Kb5og3dJOSrSuVGom9/H1FIxi1mQ NcTbCe6p7BINhtRl4heLhl6zmeIs+Kqk8G5OKKdk6k3acaXkJiZ7HmBa1UDzgEaa5/5jzA VdR75stzSRNi9LtHwuocedBVD/XXOuCwCF6FBkv1nTyl/DgN5D0y0JMs6nnseQ+uOFwIHu FXH1cPljg13BIsOH7Es/htUsI2MWukXkfCqfykJ9tLHrebcKnpjq5i1ltynjUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740714839; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3wc2PyZxattTB/2iKPQDaGemoQjYQKdHU8N/uT3JahA=; b=fYoKfPvPNiWe1GG5JLHdCn+LtfCepNshTz/leZbdGzcBT1DPpXEQKQrCJ/GE0NEh6rF8ea BsVq7t9do7EFIjrA+V+Kxhr+qcA0zTItBkXGcFb9698p0QqifEmnCYbFmGwt9WeSFcATIK Gdn+5ci6MFp4zXkMVcmWoGZOJQ3AqhlKm0/yvuBqTWlud6U39V5rECVyyFvXUMQAP48VDK IKuIj041cQLUN/PskmGREe8T8jHIUDpntwnHW4020gaAtjChaarGhhCZpqMiR0JMDh/xIw 2ofRj0kPp8Vl3hs/kwaSLk5T/qTRYTHXqeuCDEntm97bxpQUB+2HN/n6fsQS0A== Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z3vTL4TXwz1B31 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 03:53:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTP id 51S3rwkN070727 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 03:53:58 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 51S3rwo4070726; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 03:53:58 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202502280353.51S3rwo4070726@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 03:53:58 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this port. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. An e-mail will not be sent again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/go-git | 5.10.0 | 5.14.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-im/mastodon | 4.3.2 | v4.3.4 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Fri Feb 28 05:02:48 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z3x173ZJDz5PLcZ for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 05:03:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic316-8.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic316-8.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.69.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z3x163wJxz3GRb for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 05:03:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yahoo.com header.s=s2048 header.b=s99ZmAcV; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=yahoo.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of marklmi@yahoo.com designates 98.137.69.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=marklmi@yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1740718983; bh=fn/3tdNWjMw3d58prf1yI4osFeRPeRXd22t2DrmUO2k=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=s99ZmAcVVWCROI8bfLZTUq1Jjv/ofGwYxoPUV9S9pfjadNeRQJo3uaQK6LjMP1QUr9wIbs4qoTe8lMxbf4nX/OAW5A/SkuPkgEeiG+qZxZkhl2OLOBje8dAtwF64Q6V0I8tgEPOo/Trv0PzWgsoYfsJvb3VC73nBX2YTQ1v3J+M5hqAd55bICaeMFTmW3If62zyBigs0KpoLEyTPjFmtFrgGnzDM2U2Yxz0IU0E93fR2KWF5ydIS4vQi6wVJfbF+mR7DQjtd8gAsF7/fLs8Ymq0X436V+sgoxcKesRyRLfcNxnNoG/NlaJ/qJZL7g1hN+RI4UiuZlr2a1YzncBU+Fw== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1740718983; bh=9n8IA11kDHn/972LQT7TUY1GjtQ+ixWA9vvsXfqoVnP=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:Subject:Date:To:From:Subject; b=Yl6Q06vdXaMYl9zc2Nd+jyolovUvIVI8iPsgvXBW1/s8ZtTIKrWZsKk0QNQQxGfWfW5hDMhM1uq3f7HAPPI25GgBkkRSvl2ME7PINAIAZCqvp1uHJKbVSn1G4wdrazACj7yj/VCsamOTrZoyI+owHEujq2R5jXKwYxFO/28yeARJeM0UJWCHnNEJZLRCfNrYZFSuk1gJzKRsT9L3CAXj5/4JhDgPf9nCexDWkj9Tff9D+JHtf8Nyw/Utjf4mjhxnp4n887QiGtVZHsnJlFKwq1zfG4eUgKhenBUndrUP9WXqpdPXOK6pPh75dulYk/4I/bX1AwP5EAY3ZLLvjSO2Yg== X-YMail-OSG: iLFQrvUVM1nSGphzjgp_Anbo0h1LCxRn8DbqdegKh_ASgyVrcUC8Wj0tSYY7Jrj 473gwc05WQjtjb_m5KuzpTXyD.hj3xm29vvlCCeDl.CGCBAkdA.8owQpoK_mQ8HKUPXsp1QxBofV wiUc44uBErb7npP9PprB8pBSAnfkUobHomA3KUZkpD5N2Nw2yVt9hlHLD9sNnklofcW9c4V7oWpd bydH0NHxaApbwpnZAQEZqtXAQ4E74BE6YyntH3JodC8cd7T4BtKgET74hTXlJMy2TsUuP5wNONxZ tavhlMKmYxRxjxs8HMi6zv1nvRHSK4OT3sBZEUmgJ3EieBjqEwdlKGpGEekbH.BGHSUX3u17AUIL aW8GL4puGa.cXDPzXILNrtd0U56iAODzCujpznyMBDT6cjCufmavUhQwDY2BIsVo9KdQ7ljDaDb. iqB3skaTC2k3lt26wWC_2g8hJVMbKRnFyMleUC83RJdZpyVFDhzSeRZ4YmDEHSRUqaVfjSTK4YAn PnSOr6Yttj4zS4q934gRL3_Eue_qZn3lhOYJzpXkeU3jqz6oCFugjeOJsmYQlAZHneAz.ZfgGalj kt8JogHPTqT.mtIUoVzzpkdFemHY8cGGyJbGUVQtrZDVELy6sgKoPmHXm49o_WBir5nHSD7wrpO1 x3q0OaIZzbIDudppRJWf0duzA5lr4JPWI2QmsXqwebFZkZ09V5ek5ls6N02axavRiEZz7tmRTN6e kgbqsznA9v80Js4LHQQ1GhAKhWnwkPh96pglpCqPdUbt5CmxUSSL4mkuF57mCUCSA5DUrzZVbGaK gCpIssWCPfnx3SNgtJM3t7uc2XEPW4SgtcoHrPsqW_GD8f2VPS3GD7PbEKFRZtWz5hT5KVQxuAR0 yhsxqNF0C3KtgQH.8epCzWTuCm1ZMrCMhmdJpYMs3h5hJV_xPj1WNsnc_fphOz9TcHjS1pkZISTr fz1dC9oRIULgt_qmFGENOpATLLXolhbyxNik1Ur4WgFnLuKDnUlfRdU0sm1yYktUWYP28AnMkEPD L92B_wttO_xsx7s_VLpGxwjB3Etp0jVFTFtD.L0Qm8RSvJofmmjexNZjzwzzo2yU9L3fImPoSPoL RpTfO.97cw4TF47lbB.sJLkoJ4tpmTLHSvKfIZ7DyuFMDD45zZ9iEinK0w4soNcQnf1tpS0MC3yu rS8ZyAHWnj3wb19mlLQUzhsKtgCtw2cxWkvVHdnAx6V5ZG6JVqM7tha5YQgrXA9abQZdN_z_70bh h4YBBoxM.VOJPwRTVjrBrNeHKNXwKP4J5eqh8L.jIsR2AEsOef9N1M2tLjULn3RxjzAJ8fk1QYFj Ecyeubj1gQLpVZ5A0EU2FMRD.G4DZLseKYujG8LQ0SmEnPh8YwQ8bMWIXgqr8pidGZzxk31AU_oQ vvuBl0OvKQj4cmv0ebXGb65ctPdU_db_BCVFdBFpMlknFKy1S2uVbUFQLdZp.wX4O_fK22OFIWJ2 gvKMHjbN0iEx813aI1bx5r5KWyykshaFOvUW6dUxuvtMEoG6obvahMJ5rXcrXCb88w4RgntdIk0o f3xa9UHfBUle1rBWvc0lGchWOJVpGWzaM2FwpUXKFoRCjP3YmcPYOpaXkm_T9gAs.ascbSczm2M7 fi7Nq_ckqrgjpApNTFZYmx7.L3GO2DFykhNApNU4917tzrKTWOj045E_fDrzEoACbFnZG9Aboh3h E3K.blH5qmud0qj.P8zIAxc8NOGUk5lZws0TSiChPcBehl6KwppyVGNCm4FvzO6HhsejZKxweVjx efhy6QHEr3xxnMM1yYAeBJf4il4gZCXiyRf_KC.xZhrj03w2ub3lIjK5ea0nY3Upl_XdGphx_peV WLshQHKj9PLWPRYkdGXQvWzsa.b9vnd4MxIFRAKwZJ8N0zOcFS.syQj1kNGugVKoVTkW6UT5ffkg qioVM5xbhYi.dMr278471glys4wlqMApcUkde93E8M33e7w.enW7OzqQZIqW77BlMqjv08SPKvHA B4JWrx7_DmEpMgddbPLOblmIigcZxLDXExmpSs00UCNwDrMPKIHERLbTrQVaMuTTCF.RLoOyq.l1 As0vNuTl5dN0bnqfCoMtLItxr5FSdWsrauSW9JZd4jIPo1_h9tcYLoTkBk8UQqnFNgDHSqaTLBLi iVgzs2ipGtUdZn0KOQ_Qr5Z.mSqG4IwNz3eVH1SvdjBIr_YhJUXRifoh.fZLOTXMgx8M5D5.xpEA GvLIxv3FtbIpfckzZh.V81F8LNA4oFaKBs1yUlcT3nRNN9l7DQKcuiT0xPeDknrg6ioMmAfR6n49 7SobU X-Sonic-MF: X-Sonic-ID: a7dfd320-690b-4fca-9b41-27771c49de75 Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic316.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 05:03:03 +0000 Received: by hermes--production-gq1-75cc957d6c-xr9gh (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID fa9c326e45c8327f4449527fdede636b; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 05:02:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.400.131.1.6\)) Subject: Re: phantom version numbers? Message-Id: <6D1B28B1-EA66-43AD-9A94-6A3A0E5BFC6C@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:02:48 -0800 To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.400.131.1.6) References: <6D1B28B1-EA66-43AD-9A94-6A3A0E5BFC6C.ref@yahoo.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.72 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RBL_SENDERSCORE_REPUT_9(-1.00)[98.137.69.32:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.934]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.91)[-0.908]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.62)[0.616]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com:dkim]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[98.137.69.32:from]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[98.137.69.32:from] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z3x163wJxz3GRb X-Spamd-Bar: - Steve Kargl wrote on Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:52:17 UTC : > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:27:56PM +0900, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > >=20 > > Just a prediction, but possibly build cluster for main (15-Current) = are > > running on 1500033, while your build environment is running on = 1500031. > >=20 >=20 > That is exactly the problem. Someone tracking freebsd-current > may have slightly different kernel running than the one used > to biuld INDEX-15. In my case, I have >=20 > % sysctl -a | grep osreldate > kern.osreldate: 1500031 >=20 > and INDEX-15 was built on a system with 1500033. >=20 > > IIUC, the purpose of the kmod version string change is to provide > > kmod pkgs for multiple minor releases (i.e., provide kmod pkgs for = 14.2 > > even until 14.1 is EoL'ed). >=20 > IMHO, the solution is clearly wrong. INDEX-15 is only=20 > valid for short period of time. Hmmm, it seems that > the Porter's Handbook >=20 > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#versions >=20 > shows that __FreeBSD_version was changed to 1500030 on 2025-01-02. > Newer numbers are not documented. My kernel is at 1500031 with > a timestamp of >=20 > kern.version: FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #0 main-n275407-e736f6df1ec1:\ > Wed Feb 12 15:22:12 PST 2025 >=20 > and INDEX-15 is from a system with 1500033. 'git blame' shows >=20 > 05dfaadde4ae0 (Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron 2024-12-22 19:10:23 = +0100 76)\ > #define __FreeBSD_version 1500033 >=20 > So, the timestamps don't make sense. You are using a tools in ways that shows authorship dates instead of commit dates: author Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron 2024-12-22 = 18:10:23 +0000 committer Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron = 2025-02-19 20:39:46 +0000 > Looking at the lists of version numbers in the Handbook and > the large comment in sys/sys/params.h, it's clear that the=20 > last 3 digits should be trimmed. 1401 is a 14.1 system,=20 > 1402 is a 14.2 system, 1500 is freebsd-current, etc. Are there any issues for the likes of stable/14 ? 1401503 is an example ( the last stable/14 number before 1402000 was created for releng/14.2 and 1402500 was created for stable/14 ). stable/14 is up to 1400503 so far. The >=3D 500 as the last 3 digits indicates stable/ as the context instead of releng/ as the context (000..499). =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com From nobody Fri Feb 28 18:11:57 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z4GWP3SL4z5nrLP for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:12:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z4GWM3ctcz3Rlc for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:11:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=troutmask.apl.washington.edu header.s=troutmask header.b=GtqUna0o; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF" header.from=washington.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.95.76.21) smtp.mailfrom=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 51SIBwGj060312; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:11:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 troutmask.apl.washington.edu 51SIBwGj060312 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=troutmask.apl.washington.edu; s=troutmask; t=1740766318; bh=MpWrTIoMGIKMjulllSq2UNhiAzieQ4pANOnlGQGJEXk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GtqUna0okQRvfKUGw9h/UKrBlcyUBRmXZvRABTufe3j692mktns7GB+EO1RMPKueh oen8j3zIJyBSCQZfBFqU1WRxaHCDoxAcMW2lJ+ehm2/eGCczKIY74a8fzGGrcI61th /EubyR7L8Md748GUKhx6uOqCLt6W9k2v/b/ybFtxqE5a+3VgD8lxYJyo1b1SIGb8kQ unPVaM4GUnahfRIizM7MKoJrsmCWcCjnYUXFHhriOxyo52cBakNtUuiFB6vs+gl7TM a+V1Ol/CeOW5NAvufSVuBSXyN5ShRv2IbHw4n79adx3GMRZpijSo3aDcJlQ5u6x0el 1HDpNlH4cZUFQ== Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 51SIBwLv060311; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:11:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:11:57 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Tatsuki Makino Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: phantom version numbers? Message-ID: Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.18 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.982]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[128.95.76.21:from]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[washington.edu : No valid SPF,none]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_TO_DOM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[troutmask.apl.washington.edu:s=troutmask]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[hotmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[troutmask.apl.washington.edu:~]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z4GWM3ctcz3Rlc X-Spamd-Bar: -- On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 12:43:20PM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > > This may bring the topic back to the beginning, but how about adding the -P option when using pkg-version? > In my environment, both take the same amount of time to the extent that having an INDEX-* pre-built makes no sense :) > Thanks for pointing me to the -P option. That may indeed be a solution for me. This, however, does not address the fact that a running kernel and the INDEX-15 file can be inconsistent. -- Steve From nobody Fri Feb 28 18:25:43 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z4GqQ6FvRz5nsGR for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from egress.chen.org.nz (egress.chen.org.nz [170.75.172.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z4GqN68wMz3TCy; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jonc@chen.org.nz designates 170.75.172.82 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jonc@chen.org.nz Received: from mail.chen.org.nz (unknown [210.54.37.164]) by egress.chen.org.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E42125757; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 07:25:55 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from mail.chen.org.nz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filter.inside.chen.org.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339A51078B; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 07:25:44 +1300 (NZDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on ametrine.inside.chen.org.nz Received: from [192.168.1.10] (jade.inside.chen.org.nz [192.168.1.10]) by mail.chen.org.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 293731078A; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 07:25:44 +1300 (NZDT) Message-ID: <8f0436f3-023f-476b-be46-332942d47850@chen.org.nz> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 07:25:43 +1300 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: Gleb Popov , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" From: Jonathan Chen Subject: www/linux-widevine-cdm failures with Apple TV+? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.03 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.943]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.90)[0.899]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.73)[-0.727]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:egress.chen.org.nz]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[chen.org.nz]; ASN(0.00)[asn:174, ipnet:170.75.160.0/20, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z4GqN68wMz3TCy X-Spamd-Bar: / Hi, I'm trying to view content on AppleTV+ and failing. I'm seeing the following errors on stdout: worker.cpp:723: info: createCdmInstance; cdm_interface_version = 11; key_system = com.widevine.alpha capnp/rpc.c++:160: info: returning failure over rpc; exception = worker.cpp:724: failed: expected cdm_interface_version == 10 [11 == 10] stack: 61e722 4e0a50 *** Fatal uncaught kj::Exception: (remote):0: failed: remote exception: expected cdm_interface_version == 10 [11 == 10] stack: 192117e65680 192117fb58e0 worker.cpp:827: info: exiting... [6057:74335765218048:0301/071745.655208:ERROR:registration_request.cc(291)] Registration response error message: DEPRECATED_ENDPOINT This has only _just_ appeared in the past few days; possibly due to an update on AppleTV+ website? Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen From nobody Fri Feb 28 18:34:30 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z4H1M1KBKz5ntBd for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:34:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z4H1M0Bjbz3W7G for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTP id 51SIYUwt060523; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:34:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 troutmask.apl.washington.edu 51SIYUwt060523 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=troutmask.apl.washington.edu; s=troutmask; t=1740767670; bh=19a5tEtJgDoL916adQhSmAX4giZNwqDM8N4ecLNAWrM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Fkg6+TydtaSDEd5SkZfO4Oztko//j0B+/+Mq5yMp++ZBGShay2k4/4u/FKvS4sUJs J8aSArALXKufJssokSbTuR04pefjSbzwMDk6+TWKz4fv+5trh9z6YY6pNeKO5TAzZO cON5M6YmFTQYOgpOvwGseAVZxDgybecFNHPsr4istGmbncI04dTvIXyMVwagd8bfvh XQVMTYv2FEvLHa3BlltMOPryxlvCIgOfZYUCVQd58kBrL38seeA0y9kKor6V+oOsrs W52LwMMig1EUp1Q5ar8V4K+8SDklTElHh5qd8maPquS8BUCMO8fxeFdrl8KEvLWnrW zeYxS2UiM+W7Q== Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 51SIYUeh060522; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:34:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:34:30 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: phantom version numbers? Message-ID: Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <6D1B28B1-EA66-43AD-9A94-6A3A0E5BFC6C.ref@yahoo.com> <6D1B28B1-EA66-43AD-9A94-6A3A0E5BFC6C@yahoo.com> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6D1B28B1-EA66-43AD-9A94-6A3A0E5BFC6C@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z4H1M0Bjbz3W7G X-Spamd-Bar: ---- On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:02:48PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote on > Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:52:17 UTC : > > > IMHO, the solution is clearly wrong. INDEX-15 is only > > valid for short period of time. Hmmm, it seems that > > the Porter's Handbook > > > > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#versions > > > > shows that __FreeBSD_version was changed to 1500030 on 2025-01-02. > > Newer numbers are not documented. My kernel is at 1500031 with > > a timestamp of > > > > kern.version: FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #0 main-n275407-e736f6df1ec1:\ > > Wed Feb 12 15:22:12 PST 2025 > > > > and INDEX-15 is from a system with 1500033. 'git blame' shows > > > > 05dfaadde4ae0 (Jean-Sébastien Pédron 2024-12-22 19:10:23 +0100 76)\ > > #define __FreeBSD_version 1500033 > > > > So, the timestamps don't make sense. > > You are using a tools in ways that shows authorship dates instead of > commit dates: That is certainly possible. It is unfortunate the FreeBSD switch from svn to git, but that a horse of a different color. > author Jean-Sébastien Pédron 2024-12-22 18:10:23 +0000 > committer Jean-Sébastien Pédron 2025-02-19 20:39:46 +0000 % git log sys/param.h commit 05dfaadde4ae0f5d823836d5d849e3ba5ebdbf17 Author: Jean-Sébastien Pédron Date: Sun Dec 22 19:10:23 2024 +0100 linuxkpi: Add `shrinker_alloc()` and `shrinker_free()` They are used by the DRM drivers in Linux 6.7. Bump `FreeBSD_version` because external drivers that use `struct shrinker` will have to be recompiled. Reviewed by: bz Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D48747 So, the date here is completely useless and there is no indication of when the commit actually occurred. As 'git log' should be an easy way to see the history of a file, why is the date the change was recorded in HEAD not displayed? -- Steve From nobody Fri Feb 28 18:49:04 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z4HLT119Tz5nvHp for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic315-54.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic315-54.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.30]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z4HLS4gBcz3XRF for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1740768558; bh=oe2iGTFbazb1pLW74vhJX7H6kyTHnNga7sCqAuW0Wv8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=i1Qqb/Dj6j0D9WMUbPVoomXdJwZGqtoXZ04/SNf3eIFwtgW0+DFqPeixrD3OjTSwaqsEsxQxXjzqXZcTiy6Cdl9FpQNIfgtJvuZaVVgvYl0s64laCJzv5EZE0sf3r/FbI4AXB7cSS2B3wpuXrM+VrxU/IUbYEVhihkmWpNqFbgYqytwVRqjd5YfoE+RkdhTnUAsf9iwzR0c80bLBjtB1j3iFThrZ24BYIZgU55A+P+KBO0nXDm9xTKDiRceNJ641v4CaxFyaEg4WapbOBdjyS57lU1BNpBtlxrYCGicluQiYzxoROIBYu0uvWjNnmZ5ofJl5g2lgCZj2ptNitlxOjw== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1740768558; bh=/BW6NG3R/kuv3N8CKfO1S0N45nzvJ0R1bkFV0pVtw8N=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Subject:From:Date:To:From:Subject; b=NcfWPJiBs5bDgn2EY2UOsc1/PsBd7CXUpjD4iYMC1drsowoxiGlUIw3NkFUoWvSgYioVqX3c1QjW6n0Zv+XukicE0aZWV4mF/u+siXJQ84iSwIUROiVrh+8NbECjbJOo4QEFTBMQGJuVy4lfI5CZz9tjo5IpW6SA0QPOhEpX2MNhP55qsoYRth3jWaKEbkxR5sM4NzzMli5Ic0NjjmBYRRPmflx8blQgoQri+r/pR0p6TsoyJxupeMbFM/Ur9mvUpj4KoTVT81k51L24eMBkdq1X0rggtsP3Ka/mDhewv65RWH4fyQAVRrJktUO0tr2FX3UR6hlblJM6ESeVEpRm6g== X-YMail-OSG: TAYR3TsVM1lym5cTKNK7WIbNtFP9k_RUjPasGjURQ7zXF87350WKao5IkNC5Hm9 QrOV_p9N26lK8u1myvHR_x9UinVz4CRzZcUogdnYHArBcadIGiWFYpJAAnZt98y_A9nVJFF4URLd 91uSqF5yJxoXc3uErtDursDAjotPVhVZZoqR2Lr4Ev_QpuTnyAQEp6_s1vO_.gjSWNAzAkDZT4e3 K5d9basWXCWQChJCqRSDo_ocTeOUhe16yjFsle5KXbsohwgLzsfOlr_Gypo6NrT5jynDRKPq5v.7 X3s2.umq04SuzDiBe.j05CnaiBz6cAMhKhumCtocisC3R41_H4w4So1BQPJhxpJwbVys9fOU4jrx _wBPsDC5wArNcmr1ez.wGLb9c5WO6beP5hC3_JWgWC_8QjyKqs8Be86Ru6AE3AdQig1yyTYC8NEu juGQ.G.ZIbphtf2O.6OP5HsYKBi.G1XEH4.STbz2p12Okt.cmAR4PbSr80cOy12W7TyJjJu4Igi4 FWC3YySRvX2s4Fjo0XpVWuwuo.436Co1s6N1ZpgkSfzY1gJh2jW27.mc_l_5BKnWVr0Uk9U5VJpe m_tQlRC9Wr9dLx2m0qaahY05hwjoCVfCDcztYAFBWK8X1k5DZmqotokXY1UVB3zHvxEt0EjIlO1E FJ4Jb1hQRt6fOl1F8GSRJnTfMpKk38evvSg83eDt9_OcafJHh1O9KaCFgCJw_uGiAoOPpDJ1Hbs5 pHD5Mrq3jR6u00W5SWDkXuPayfafzPj5bOQm2svC0hmPwHiXFbpymI6vvYy38s8_yii2qp5dYTHn qmUWZ2vwNs7Fd4UnfUJ4FICAxpOcJz10HDccH2zVI1ZOdvqjYBg.Lgln.zYY2v_EgBcUx0mEhM5U 3kGdZvrPRc7K6Y6EUZXtjwN9O_xyaiVhg3lFbOPTymUbpInHSvlynX4XdQdu25rRz3TOcYz2680j T5WabMfee66to0trRzpYkc4CdBrUQ0k3uq6xMeE9bdt8JBAJLP.nK9LyxOk4fO1aUXVXXOIS.fbC hKhaQqHAmWheUVbnlF1l1elnEwEd0GcUW56P_be4rtBGAoqPknxUamXQ2MFWy4koM9Jzm0BVcT8s 17u7QV1cjkaFm4RLggzFzRk_K5k7jI_zlA1IsHRMq21.XEpcgUgeDslp8U9FPjYG701xoln7BpMi TMKrPRCogUZ.ehiwE9HVLQl4ZkViWWvlHu_eJp0xAbn31hou04KIghexH63xHyzHID2dIeT9vyTk _6oXqga9CaKMNXs.5FQfdIFoFEHKom1Qb0QZhCzBJ7HlsKTkk5dsyVm0xdzyCOxkL65_.chxEgid _bFjd.0qtIrFzYDD8MEKHe3x5gcfFJ4cEXmEfm_GTmRh2Avj3U149z6CMbe09EIqe.1_zcmKdKJC w2bH7Fq17wT9_oNwP8Emjibtw4o12o1.ustcWPESAywirBnOmra8O8ymvLyWVGnl7L7Nsduccr3N 4jyiyoOs2Vc3kt.aSoLRQjy76eAIGv0FNycAEMNVW0.mRuS3LS5m_ZWuaG_zq8lW_yxHNOkeessR 6r0ODIKpEMpVKI.O8x9qPjpFEV9NeeaFa4xVeqIJqL0ivRrP9yapkZaVJO4ItrtdJ1z4.uk2Px_e tc5J4IThySQR9N7D3kA1_NDIw0fMAW9EdmLEGfNXRcpRNiZr_KCtlq9ckzBxsYnBrQSSPNyetmDk vzzpra3n68vI7GHblSL5TkMHfnRWRooTx3X6pjWFWq7MrqbnRifbVafwuERJl0DAgm8CSLxeKx70 7W.WtK.DnW6DJQr6EVrdTwt81.BHeQr_FwS0iYiVZMJiCCvBjpydPr6VM1qNILp8tuCG.oWVz8jz bfKRIHNUS.iBKBBFOO41vfQt7TVGURCA_wj.witAF703xMnZx7hlwggTk2gP4GeKqSx8gqs8yOay YnJicpJmUz10lYQD09PlFCEZEGNLJxaSNgSYoF3PthlO5xbHt7lLc.Tnd._Y9CF6lYreGASdPOXn Oxe58i4fKKWvj6gLErqICZli.ONyL.LKiChI0hmEoFCJCMMSG_cdJsX.oy4lXGP89m.5cRZILU7B .ev133ki3iT6hNrfBu2A.dpvmZ2qnQ.fP1E3qeYlSbIOc9UA.Ve.SKZg4mpOvnbv2OObRylnMaop QQCoqZjcpSx9vcvOVm7Ev7_RcN52EQYUwpJ9qB5EdGNanokapnOYzAxiPSiVUwc04K.MVi4Mg8ZF uNCY6GCMxn1yDgSiiP_o3zhgFG2eZ12jNFZ5.ZRh4bXuPUWi3MCjCN_duFX0IThkfochxjrrj6g- - X-Sonic-MF: X-Sonic-ID: d09c75f8-0350-45d0-91ad-f64eb1acef65 Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic315.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:49:18 +0000 Received: by hermes--production-gq1-75cc957d6c-7gjr6 (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 5eb87056e4a1024f9345981013f055e7; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.400.131.1.6\)) Subject: Re: phantom version numbers? From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:49:04 -0800 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5A1BFC69-F6B0-467D-983F-49AD6CCA9B0E@yahoo.com> References: <6D1B28B1-EA66-43AD-9A94-6A3A0E5BFC6C.ref@yahoo.com> <6D1B28B1-EA66-43AD-9A94-6A3A0E5BFC6C@yahoo.com> To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.400.131.1.6) X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/20, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z4HLS4gBcz3XRF X-Spamd-Bar: ---- On Feb 28, 2025, at 10:34, Steve Kargl = wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:02:48PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >> Steve Kargl wrote on >> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 18:52:17 UTC : >>=20 >>> IMHO, the solution is clearly wrong. INDEX-15 is only=20 >>> valid for short period of time. Hmmm, it seems that >>> the Porter's Handbook >>>=20 >>> https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/book/#versions >>>=20 >>> shows that __FreeBSD_version was changed to 1500030 on 2025-01-02. >>> Newer numbers are not documented. My kernel is at 1500031 with >>> a timestamp of >>>=20 >>> kern.version: FreeBSD 15.0-CURRENT #0 main-n275407-e736f6df1ec1:\ >>> Wed Feb 12 15:22:12 PST 2025 >>>=20 >>> and INDEX-15 is from a system with 1500033. 'git blame' shows >>>=20 >>> 05dfaadde4ae0 (Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron 2024-12-22 19:10:23 = +0100 76)\ >>> #define __FreeBSD_version 1500033 >>>=20 >>> So, the timestamps don't make sense. >>=20 >> You are using a tools in ways that shows authorship dates instead of >> commit dates: >=20 > That is certainly possible. It is unfortunate the FreeBSD switch > from svn to git, but that a horse of a different color. >=20 >> author Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron = 2024-12-22 18:10:23 +0000 >> committer Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron = 2025-02-19 20:39:46 +0000 >=20 > % git log sys/param.h=20 >=20 > commit 05dfaadde4ae0f5d823836d5d849e3ba5ebdbf17 > Author: Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron > Date: Sun Dec 22 19:10:23 2024 +0100 >=20 > linuxkpi: Add `shrinker_alloc()` and `shrinker_free()` >=20 > They are used by the DRM drivers in Linux 6.7. >=20 > Bump `FreeBSD_version` because external drivers that use `struct > shrinker` will have to be recompiled. >=20 > Reviewed by: bz > Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D48747 >=20 > So, the date here is completely useless and there is no indication > of when the commit actually occurred. As 'git log' should be an > easy way to see the history of a file, why is the date the change > was recorded in HEAD not displayed? # git log --pretty=3Dfuller Shows the likes of: commit Author: AuthorDate: Commit: CommitDate: For just the commit date/time sort of information, there is: # git log --pretty=3Dformat:%cd # Example; the committer dates formats = are: %cd committer date (format respects --date=3D option) %cD committer date, RFC2822 style %cr committer date, relative %ct committer date, UNIX timestamp %ci committer date, ISO 8601-like format %cI committer date, strict ISO 8601 format %cs committer date, short format (YYYY-MM-DD) %ch committer date, human style (like the --date=3Dhuman option of = git-rev-list(1)) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com From nobody Fri Feb 28 21:32:42 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z4LzF3Bl0z59JCx for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 21:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx2.enfer-du-nord.net (mx2.enfer-du-nord.net [135.125.211.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z4LzD2R4Wz3pQT for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 21:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ellael.org header.s=dkim header.b=eOvR0dno; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=ellael.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of trashcan@ellael.org designates 135.125.211.209 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=trashcan@ellael.org Received: from smtpclient.apple (p200300fb4f379e011cbcce4a7f5e67b7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:fb:4f37:9e01:1cbc:ce4a:7f5e:67b7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Z4Lz859jGz1Mr5 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2025 22:32:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ellael.org; s=dkim; t=1740778372; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f6/jpVCtzMDHoZZjPIfz2VSS0hEIsZf+PK2SjTFApy8=; b=eOvR0dnoBFiOtDGFCqq5xCM8KpF3dX5OhHY7GXtULVMrZos7RbPqGxjhjJD0N9ofV+n/rF TCqaMoBujB6vrF0o7URcx3vhYxlvzuXdvuGGnynM5Ad+rsijNi3BVw71n+cthwOK7cV5ke uVKFjbJeOUqSilo5DKrMGNbaYkuLfUutUtveDG/zsUev3KV6CCooCnRjXRo7mY2/T6+yXb R+sCykBeeVB2Nv68stqiXs9XknMJeUXu78wkbjfJCpUSfm7eZJqSs4xcUzkjXypGMrQPAO /HQswOKev9u5iDk6t1hgh9G3IeZjDSI2etVXh3P+x+/C7O0mCzqKkF/ioDYW+A== From: Michael Grimm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.400.131.1.6\)) Subject: New maintainer: would that be a no-go? Message-Id: <16F0D879-0B18-4C9E-AFA5-442215955CA9@ellael.org> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 22:32:42 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.400.131.1.6) X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.04 / 15.00]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.982]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.76)[-0.762]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[ellael.org,quarantine]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.20)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:135.125.211.209]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ellael.org:s=dkim]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ellael.org:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:135.125.128.0/17, country:FR]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[135.125.211.209:from] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z4LzD2R4Wz3pQT X-Spamd-Bar: -- Hi, I am the new maintainer of sysutils/logwatch and I never have been a = maintainer of any port before. Thus a newbie ;-) Upstream is releasing new versions twice a year, January and July. I = made some contributions to logwatch which have been accepted immediately = after the last release in January in order to give some time for testing = by the logwatch team members. This is my question: Would it be a no-go if I would patch the current = release w.r.t the upcoming release in July this year? Benefit would be: #) Ability to deal with FBSD's 'syslogd -v' patterns = in logfiles if activated [1] #) Discard dependency of a perl module, namely HTML::HTML5::Entities [2] #) Improvement of the dovecot script [3] #) Plus some other minor modifications Thanks in advance, Michael BTW: Would someone capable of committing PR 285078, just a simple bug = fix [4]?=20 Very much appreciated. [1] = https://sourceforge.net/p/logwatch/git/ci/85f3b99d78b7dda81b00d252fbd2ff6c= 4f430ec9/ [2] = https://sourceforge.net/p/logwatch/git/ci/42e949949e90980acfe3d9c5c9a46ecf= e73b2df1/ [3] = https://sourceforge.net/p/logwatch/git/ci/5072cff136957bcdb7228d707d97a8c5= 377896d4/ =20 [4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D285078 From nobody Sat Mar 1 03:51:03 2025 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z4WMX0JmXz5hrYl for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 03:51:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z4WMW5qRCz3k3c for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 03:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1740801063; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=l7skZC052km91nzFhgg+377Ybull4emSuN/AbueCKcLgCo8VU8op/MRmeLOMGBB7arJ3nH Wb7c5cxEHVgwCKhA3hlXeBVABYjTWxJqFeE/A8QW4LOIC0t+Wi/dotrTHmiZKTqKrcsl89 dAE3cySWP4A1yZz4cHYkhe2MX1fZ9FyLlr38yt6hYGAEh9NsL8snCvmj6fCf9kNJ/Ihz1Z 7Q0Av4CjMhKecpVDRnUL655zJWdHTPvZaifmX+Za6qOy/pnhmolnSTpHRCrcocffYG4sU/ 3HdH8Kb/rUVLIE2ZFV42Fnh1zJkNEmjarrDlrewF3yIzYGhRa3rUhSFvumKD6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740801063; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4reKVhj42H0Rq5eOMQplDgJB+ZSirqMFtAzqKp6jeFs=; b=wtXX7iQ+h1Y2Rge0gqq3ItOzDWlJiNm2BAqAQcJDRpBIul1SR6RhIOM9kjvMACGmqXJ/6b E4vwjdF+cOhEvARnUcKpsucFaPAGIO+ZJD9YX/j3XKJM7vR/6zQKzcnBqISN9WQxnb9t67 oL0PEykWlxchbBNAYDt9tQXvNKcJaJF/2/KyWxVmDbwqLcvnyVsCanUcT3Za2tjYJ9zTRn rCigsUsl5DZ2k+kzhvHnVH0Vw0eB4lYEdyeTb9Wh91fpQQVrhkM+7XEPwiegNHJyeyT6is IkelqgiAQXFH2PszaRA0QyLRvgJZV777PJ2tZJziWCxj4nukrwlmrrxtPi9ZMQ== Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z4WMW3qJCzy9P for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 03:51:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTP id 5213p3YN041063 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2025 03:51:03 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 5213p3qc041062; Sat, 1 Mar 2025 03:51:03 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202503010351.5213p3qc041062@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 03:51:03 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this port. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. An e-mail will not be sent again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/clickhouse | 22.1.3.7 | v25.2.1.3085-stable ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/intel-graphics-compiler | 1.0.12504.5 | v2.7.11 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/intel-compute-runtime | 22.24.23453 | 25.05.32567.17 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-im/signal-cli | 0.9.0 | v0.13.13 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ security/py-ailment | 9.0.5405 | v9.2.144 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From nobody Sat Mar 1 06:38:31 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z4b4n14l6z5nqT8 for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 06:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from diizzy@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z4b4n0NqPz43FQ; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 06:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from diizzy@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740811113; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nyORC2MGwampeJuxUXKHNgw8rAoyOeKE0CtUOyrKCyA=; b=c/E2UsqMJdhXxxT+NVsCKsM9/NJ3uPwYFSMEXyV8G0XDJ6nhYizFLo/wHZcCd1JODGqr5+ FLysubLiloTU8zBVmcwUPnj5excNMUWrLlV2Y8GMAjNzSViv3ACc9ozHNM/oTiOEZDwHrs hrrEFxKZl70X5Y1jRyQrUxZ46NjY2hG/LwwW+q1LttAKtZigkVgj6uwM9B2SddbfHkJNQR 49avhuq2c4WSoXUhPEjD7yKCBxGPO05WcssxEcBro7b64cfbO9Y0ZKjt2W4Tc6WBNb2tO3 FG799yTm/3SIRxYdc16vKTcguDDCL3d//3UJUpf2BupENLlm4La3YXytXMvlrA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1740811113; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=KstWcsfwQen/QrwxtjHa5JVF+x2ue9Jxv7j70sfkruBoz9hJoq6SGDppJ7YUNr7WYbbkD+ hRcuU0OoWxVajvjlGHyNE1dXJ0XzN6rg2g+zmhh6fJq8ZZ4WdM51vETGeeSTFA/H1gRkxa xs4F/BWvRr5i2y6oGbCTwQdPORKP6gzstOMs2vjYLXBOkIXMj50TpWY/JyfDKXtIfh8R1n 542PUAeoqtFmpf4+eIkdcwEF2QVLOaodJ5aAUZIspXMCIrgmL1DNzNfdSZn0/p/lSFKLMd ewRQ7UiqDeRp+rVh2nOA1nq+Ttewm+/3U5udoMYhYOb6oIF87kbmpJKqPaFL/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740811113; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nyORC2MGwampeJuxUXKHNgw8rAoyOeKE0CtUOyrKCyA=; b=BZG8Fa4atwvX+V21x4xTRy/cEVcDL70mVnrhdF5FfTKN+vcI3n3ag26s/rppkqnfSyNB+p hhd+wYxoovVCmyI1os+6v8zsFWG44NNJrvRFzCS9lKuBp7AxdatJNUHrFFJUcLCSgDJwRG CTksg1hoO8kz0pxGpETLXkobC6PLqW4YgjNRyXhUqb6+8wx9YvL40Df2lsIQ3MdUi82AgB 50KSUnH33ra/wFWcmt6xPlLiTfkJYnwqtEQzg6kki4aJtiJcFWoUG2ZqueWzaNPoWW/orO hXGIRKOtMJbpJ+3FH6Y6eTWcvWIIqauhrqlDAZXfZMei167S5RONn7c0B7H8GQ== Received: from [192.168.1.238] (90-229-134-185-no600.tbcn.telia.com [90.229.134.185]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: diizzy/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Z4b4m2flnz5s1; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 06:38:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from diizzy@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------uhaliaovA8RCL0Esw3T8GgYd" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 07:38:31 +0100 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows) Subject: Re: New maintainer: would that be a no-go? To: Michael Grimm , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <16F0D879-0B18-4C9E-AFA5-442215955CA9@ellael.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Daniel Engberg In-Reply-To: <16F0D879-0B18-4C9E-AFA5-442215955CA9@ellael.org> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------uhaliaovA8RCL0Esw3T8GgYd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2025-02-28 22:32, Michael Grimm wrote: > Hi, > > I am the new maintainer of sysutils/logwatch and I never have been a maintainer of any port before. Thus a newbie ;-) > > Upstream is releasing new versions twice a year, January and July. I made some contributions to logwatch which have been accepted immediately after the last release in January in order to give some time for testing by the logwatch team members. > > This is my question: Would it be a no-go if I would patch the current release w.r.t the upcoming release in July this year? > > Benefit would be: > > #) Ability to deal with FBSD's 'syslogd -v' patterns in logfiles if activated [1] > #) Discard dependency of a perl module, namely HTML::HTML5::Entities [2] > #) Improvement of the dovecot script [3] > #) Plus some other minor modifications > > Thanks in advance, > Michael > > BTW: Would someone capable of committing PR 285078, just a simple bug fix [4]? > Very much appreciated. > > > [1]https://sourceforge.net/p/logwatch/git/ci/85f3b99d78b7dda81b00d252fbd2ff6c4f430ec9/ > [2]https://sourceforge.net/p/logwatch/git/ci/42e949949e90980acfe3d9c5c9a46ecfe73b2df1/ > [3]https://sourceforge.net/p/logwatch/git/ci/5072cff136957bcdb7228d707d97a8c5377896d4/ > > [4]https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=285078 Hi, Maintainers are given relatively "free hands" however the general encouragement is not to diverge from upstream if possible. Having local patches (especially many) significantly increases maintenance burden as they tend to break when upstream releases a new version. If patching is desired/required try to be as verbose as possible as to why and origin, and always try to upstream as much as possible. Unfortunately a common reason as to why ports gets stick to a specific version is when there are lots of patches with lacking documentation and/or not upstreamed changes. In your specific case I don't see why it would be seen as an issue given that you've provided documentation and the fact that they're backports from upstream (thanks for submitting these changes upstream). Thanks for adopting sysutils/logwatch ! Best regards, Daniel --------------uhaliaovA8RCL0Esw3T8GgYd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 2025-02-28 22:32, Michael Grimm wrote:
Hi,

I am the new maintainer of sysutils/logwatch and I never have been a maintainer of any port before. Thus a newbie ;-)

Upstream is releasing new versions twice a year, January and July. I made some contributions to logwatch which have been accepted immediately after the last release in January in order to give some time for testing by the logwatch team members.

This is my question: Would it be a no-go if I would patch the current release w.r.t the upcoming release in July this year?

Benefit would be:

#) Ability to deal with FBSD's 'syslogd -v' <facility.severity> patterns in logfiles if activated [1]
#) Discard dependency of a perl module, namely HTML::HTML5::Entities [2]
#) Improvement of the dovecot script [3]
#) Plus some other minor modifications

Thanks in advance,
Michael

BTW: Would someone capable of committing PR 285078, just a simple bug fix [4]? 
     Very much appreciated.


[1] https://sourceforge.net/p/logwatch/git/ci/85f3b99d78b7dda81b00d252fbd2ff6c4f430ec9/
[2] https://sourceforge.net/p/logwatch/git/ci/42e949949e90980acfe3d9c5c9a46ecfe73b2df1/
[3] https://sourceforge.net/p/logwatch/git/ci/5072cff136957bcdb7228d707d97a8c5377896d4/    

[4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=285078

Hi,

Maintainers are given relatively "free hands" however the general encouragement is not to diverge from upstream if possible.

Having local patches (especially many) significantly increases maintenance burden as they tend to break when upstream releases a new version. If patching is desired/required try to be as verbose as possible as to why and origin, and always try to upstream as much as possible. Unfortunately a common reason as to why ports gets stick to a specific version is when there are lots of patches with lacking documentation and/or not upstreamed changes.

In your specific case I don't see why it would be seen as an issue given that you've provided documentation and the fact that they're backports from upstream (thanks for submitting these changes upstream).

Thanks for adopting sysutils/logwatch !

Best regards,

Daniel

--------------uhaliaovA8RCL0Esw3T8GgYd-- From nobody Sat Mar 1 18:54:40 2025 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z4vQn0s4Zz5pYhr for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 18:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dennypage@me.com) Received: from mr85p00im-hyfv06011401.me.com (mr85p00im-hyfv06011401.me.com [17.58.23.191]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z4vQm4Kz1z478Y for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2025 18:55:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dennypage@me.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=me.com header.s=1a1hai header.b=muiWiKWp; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=me.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dennypage@me.com designates 17.58.23.191 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dennypage@me.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai; bh=sYIPVHELvvMx03xapxk0ZhtdZYW0y5UxsOsILa6Tlb8=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To:x-icloud-hme; b=muiWiKWpY7mfm1a5DxbLXGOHRIhRDSMk9wDr5Su7N3qb4T5pXUEPuWV9UrsqqNHVm VHS1pDcZNEN8LsV3yPgEJGOhQRCWOVLgKIPuGI3V6NVilhjBXzQWQ/VmFKxRWB0NPF s2jaA3//3Wg4Hl890NQQQSq1cn3YoZTKoovqwSIErp2i4Xabi+dWS8eHbotxSM1vnM O2AjoZEhLO/BV5Eq50Zt8w2ADD3ze2VDeNix6EM8xzoAoCbI7X/6BIWgfO+2AUZkBX yDX/19cfarEHkPbbU6npEr50ciDkRKZTtAKjkQy4BZxC63GOx4FRSRoNrFkJ/7FlFJ fEyZ6lIJ2GYiQ== Received: from smtpclient.apple (mr38p00im-dlb-asmtp-mailmevip.me.com [17.57.152.18]) by mr85p00im-hyfv06011401.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADD22357AEF7; Sat, 1 Mar 2025 18:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.400.131.1.6\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: mdns-bridge-1.0.1 From: Denny Page In-Reply-To: <72547415-8804-4a30-bb6b-753c38e8e3cb@gmx.com> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 10:54:40 -0800 Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <65986336-EFEA-452D-8788-3A48325EAA39@me.com> References: <72547415-8804-4a30-bb6b-753c38e8e3cb@gmx.com> To: KOMMER Jean-Christophe X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.400.131.1.6) X-Proofpoint-GUID: KmLxMXhiYK5D5U8tPUwZEgco7ZtXBqav X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: KmLxMXhiYK5D5U8tPUwZEgco7ZtXBqav X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1057,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.68.34 definitions=2025-03-01_08,2025-02-28_01,2024-11-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2308100000 definitions=main-2503010152 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.50 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.87)[0.872]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.78)[-0.775]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[me.com,quarantine]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.20)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[me.com:s=1a1hai]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:17.58.0.0/16]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(-0.20)[17.58.23.191:from]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[17.58.23.191:from]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmx.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[me.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[me.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[me.com:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:714, ipnet:17.58.16.0/20, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[me.com:dkim]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Z4vQm4Kz1z478Y X-Spamd-Bar: - [resend] Thank you so much for bringing this to my attention. I will see to it shortly. Thanks, Denny > On Mar 1, 2025, at 01:32, KOMMER Jean-Christophe wrote: > > Hello ! > > I just wanted to point out a mismatch between rc file and Makefile. > Bin file gets installed in bin while rc looks for sbin. > Also portname is "mdns-bridge" while rc has "mdns_bridge". > > Kind regards From nobody Sun Mar 2 03:55:38 2025 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Z57QM3wLFz5hkLk for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2025 03:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R10" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z57QM0l45z3MPQ for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2025 03:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1740887739; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=k/0OWK1sbgA02W94ya/PuwziYUKeM1sFdqzcLd2nF+E7wbRyV7IZAaNIthvREqLjvtwtVX IyGwsqa/J45EvsDG1nEbeHu52+wYU2wb0M7NVDsUIlNnd9KXRVTv/Us3Ksf4ekSnnfnSrp PUASL9AyHh9czx4iHyRP4ci+q9NUXUcbxIuEEZj2upgDm0TIYUyWQIvwyqEvbpW+UsvZ3p ic19v+k8+oOQgbo/vPkP5XHuiJm7THa+J6gPXcyXnrUPuBE2HHEpW+hwgUZzwh/z7LcG/v 7ztcxPu4+x1AxzFw6ZhqM3+J6Ikd0pO4yOTOOx/lvWY1cUQtKFR15L/Ieqr2Ew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1740887739; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UNahkw8XGCP4sK4796uxrunR/T3rO2EzFEpvDW/dPeE=; b=DW6zQ9VUNdIayKPVD4tyauKSsIpZ5GqGQUqsCyAf5hPNpuoP1aKpatwCDnL2SjrPsOEDPC whY5SvtPo5mLcO9IUIXFKb5AmsL0vhPPLZNgqI9jR9+cmhvdJEuC4m/dbPuMSQPjUDBIaC n3jBoUbWsvxmeyGcueg3SmFWyrELbj28IBWlQ3QWavCUNuM53RcHG/O7UehsS9tYXiSLm+ NQT7iS2hkQIBm1wZ8WJgOTVA37UU9I9gqEiREeEZxpSP2Gw4l9DCHQTRYukB4XNQK8Rbij VJ+MXQhG62a1L7Caleviyy4sJVc/+THOGzZgeGXl5dw24KgXvfssKPuoLy9BEA== Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Z57QM04G8zkp9 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2025 03:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTP id 5223tcSJ009134 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2025 03:55:38 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 5223tcQZ009133; Sun, 2 Mar 2025 03:55:38 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202503020355.5223tcQZ009133@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 03:55:38 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this port. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. An e-mail will not be sent again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-mgmt/netxms | 3.9.420 | 5.1.4 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout!